SysOpt Forums

System Optimization and PC Performance

[ Home | News | Features | User Reviews | Overclocking | Benchmarks | About Us | Forum FAQ

Go Back   SysOpt Forums > SysOpt Community > Off-Topic

Off-Topic Give your brain a rest from the tech-talk and come discuss ALMOST anything else that's on your mind.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-07-2001, 01:45 AM   #1
sharder8
Senior Member
 
sharder8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 509
Sept. 11th, the statistics!

Interesting!

Survival Rates

By now everyone has been hearing the death toll rise and reports of the
destruction from the terrorist attacks on the US. These were deplorable
acts that we will never forget. But now is a time to look at the other
side of the numbers coming out of New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
The sad but somewhat uplifting side that the mainstream media has not
reported yet the SURVIVAL rates and some positive news about the attacks.

*** The Buildings ***

* The World Trade Center -
The twin towers of the World Trade Center were places of employment for
some 50,000 people. With the missing list of just over 5,000 people, that
means 90% of the people targeted survived the attack. A 90% on a test
is an 'A'.

* The Pentagon -
Some 23,000 people were the target of a third plane aimed at the
Pentagon. The latest count shows that only 123 lost their lives. That is
an amazing 99.5% survival rate. in addition, the plane seems to have come
in too low, too early to affect a large portion of the building. On top of
that, the section that was hit was the first of five sections to undergo
renovations that would help protect the Pentagon from terrorist attacks.
It had recently completed straightening and blast proofing, saving untold
lives. This attack was sad, but a statistical failure.

*** The Planes ***

* American Airlines Flight 77
This Boeing 757 that was flown into the outside of the Pentagon could
have carried up to 289 people, yet only 64 were aboard. Luckily 78% of the
seats were empty.

* American Airlines Flight 11
This Boeing 767 could have had up to 351 people aboard, but only carried
92. Thankfully 74% of the seats were unfilled.

* United Airlines Flight 175
Another Boeing 767 that could have sat 351 people only had 65 people on
board. Fortunately it was 81% empty.

* United Airlines Flight 93
This Boeing 757 was one of the most uplifting stories yet. The smallest
flight to be hijacked with only 45 people aboard out of a possible 289 had
84% of its capacity unused. Yet these people stood up to the attackers and
thwarted a fourth attempted destruction of a national landmark, saving
untold numbers of lives in the process.

*** In Summary ***
Out of potentially 74,280 Americans directly targeted by these inept
cowards, 93% survived or avoided the attacks. That's a higher survival
rate than heart attacks, breast cancer, kidney transplants and liver
transplants -all common, survivable illnesses. The Hijacked planes were
mostly empty, the Pentagon was hit at it's strongest point, the
overwhelming majority of people in the World Trade Center buildings
escaped, and a handful of passengers gave the ultimate sacrifice to save
even more lives.
sharder8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2001, 07:55 AM   #2
RustyGT
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Nth Qld. Aust.
Posts: 161
Sharder
With all due respect, to the terrible human tragedy, of Sept11.

And now, its been brought to mention.

If the US Airline Industry "is in trouble" following 9/11 then what shape was it in, prior?

The figures you quote, for the planes 'on the day' are awful, regardless of the outcome, 'on the day'

That you can say, that we should be thankful that the flight nos were so low before this, is hardly any thing, for us to go on with.

My point here is, there are no small mercies.

Aviation the world over can't blame Sept11, for it's problems, 'now'.
Nor can it do so, as we pick up the pieces.

Looking for easy scapegoats, will not fix the underlying problems.

There is much work to be done. ChrsR.

Last edited by RustyGT; 10-07-2001 at 09:22 AM.
RustyGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2001, 08:55 AM   #3
OuTpaTienT
www.TechIMO.com
 
OuTpaTienT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: www.techIMO.com
Posts: 3,291
A couple things:

First, I don't believe it was any accident or stroke of "luck" that the planes were so empty. The hi-jackers had been planning this event very thoroughly. They knew darn well that the less passengers aboard their planes only increased the odds of them succeeding with their goal of commondering the aircraft. And therefore they intentionally chose a day & time when they knew there would be many empty seats.

Second, your statement of "The twin towers of the World Trade Center were places of employment for some 50,000 people." is an incorrect one. Although you wouldn't know it with the way the lazy press just sling around that very statement. As I understand it, the WTC was indeed populated by some 50,000 employees...but, not 50,000 in the twin towers. The WTC complex was made up of 7 buildings, with the twin towers being only two of those. The figure I've heard in regards to how many of those 50,000 employees actually worked in the towers is in the neighborhood of 24,000 - 28,000 persons.

None of this invalidates your points, nor is that what I'm trying to do. I just wanted to share the info that I knew in a effort to keep things as factual as possible.
OuTpaTienT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2001, 01:23 PM   #4
Ed_S
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 1,215
Also, I find it amazing that there were so few killed in the surrounding buildings, or by the debris. Recently, I met a man who is on Mo's FEMA disaster team and was at ground zero within 24 hrs. The photos he has are amazing, and show devastation (close up) far above anything I've seen in the media. One former office building looks like a parking garage, only the structure remains & the photo shows that you can see clear through it.
Many more buildings are damaged beyond repair. He says his information is that at least twenty additional buildings will be leveled, one already has been.
But relatively few people were killed in them.
__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.

Ed_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 AM.


  • Weekly CPU Prices for February 5, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for January 29, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for January 22, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for January 15, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for January 8, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for December 31, 2009
  • Weekly CPU Prices for December 25, 2009
  • Weekly CPU Prices for December 18, 2009




    IBM Power7: Big Blue's Answer to Oracle, Intel
    Chip Stocks Stabilize as Market Fall Continues
    Mozilla Firefox to Drop Support of Mac OS X 10.4
    SAP's CEO Ouster Latest Indication of Troubles
    Oracle Adds SOA Depth with AmberPoint Deal
    Cisco Aims to Simplify Datacenter Migrations
    Google Earns High Marks for Super Bowl Ad
    Investors Unimpressed With NetSuite's Q4
    Facebook Says Adios to Microsoft Banner Ads
    Why Red Hat Had to Pull the Plug on Exchange


  • Acceptable Use Policy


    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
    Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Copyright 2002 Jupitermedia Corporation