Register above for Internet.com profile. Forum registration click here
SysOpt Forums

System Optimization and PC Performance

[ Home | News | Features | User Reviews | Overclocking | Benchmarks | About Us | Forum FAQ

Go Back   SysOpt Forums > Modifications > CPU's and Overclocking

CPU's and Overclocking Anything and everything regarding overclocking AND CPU's/Microprocessors.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-23-2003, 07:35 AM   #1
Tor
Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 229
AMD Athlon 2600/333fsb owners read

All of you AMD fans may want to read this if you purchased an XP2600 with 333Mhz FSB. AMD goofed up! (Imagine that please don't take offense, I'm just kidding)

http://www.neoseeker.com/news/articl...Hardware/2269/

Tor
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 12:51 AM   #2
CustomCompGOD
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MN
Posts: 2
What the hell are you talking about? I just bought an AMD XP2600 with 333FSB...how did they screw up now? Everything seems to be running great on my comp!
CustomCompGOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 07:19 AM   #3
Tor
Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 229
The article didn't say EVERY processor was wrong. I just posted the article for information, AMD sent out 2600/266's in 2600/333 boxes. Thought people that may have purchased one may want to read the article to see if they may have gotten a wrong one. For some newer people it's plug and play and they may not have noticed that the FSB was only running at 266.
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 11:46 AM   #4
jmichna
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,708
Quote:
Originally posted by CustomCompGOD
What the hell are you talking about? I just bought an AMD XP2600 with 333FSB...how did they screw up now? Everything seems to be running great on my comp!
The article... if you bothered to read it... said less than 500 of the 266fsb cpus which got put into the wrong (333fsb) packaging, actually made it out the doors of AMD.

The way Tor worded his post... I think he may have a successful career in sensational journalism ahead of him
jmichna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 05:47 PM   #5
CustomCompGOD
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MN
Posts: 2
Yeah sorry about that. Made a judgement on your post before I had really read the article. I just purchased an XP2600 and didn't want to hear anything bad about it. I'm glad you found that so that other people know about it and I'll have to be more careful about posts in the future. Thanks.
CustomCompGOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 09:59 PM   #6
Rugor
Ultimate Member
 
Rugor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest, Earth
Posts: 2,694
I read about this on HardOCP.

AMD made a mistake and slightly under 500 CPU's got out the door. They said when in doubt the markings on the processor supersede those on the packaging, and that people should return the processors to the point of sale for a replacement.

The article I read went on to commend AMD for coming clean very quickly and taking immediate steps to remedy the situation.

No one's perfect, so the measure of a company is how they fix their problems.
__________________
"Dude you're getting a Dell." Obscure curse from the early 21st Century, ascribed to a minor demon-spirit known as "Stephen?" [sp].
Rugor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 11:23 PM   #7
Tor
Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 229
Quote:
The way Tor worded his post... I think he may have a successful career in sensational journalism ahead of him
Sorry, I'm an electronics technician, not a writer. Writing was never a strong point which is why I went into electronics.

CustomCompGOD: No problem, everyone mis-reads stuff. Plus I think I could have worded my original post a little better.

Tor

Last edited by Tor; 01-24-2003 at 11:50 PM.
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.


  • Weekly CPU Prices for November 10, 2009
  • Weekly CPU Prices for November 3, 2009
  • Weekly CPU Prices for October 27, 2009
  • Weekly CPU Prices for October 20, 2009
  • Weekly CPU Prices for October 13, 2009
  • nVidia's Chipset Business Faces Problems
  • Weekly CPU Prices for October 6, 2009
  • nVidia's New GPU Has "the Soul of a Supercomputer"




    Windows 7 Sales 'Fantastic,' Ballmer Says
    Google Shows Off Chrome OS, Releases Source
    AT&T and Verizon Set for Court Battle
    Web 2.0 Makeover Poses Big Risks for Gov't: Study
    Yahoo Adds Twitter to News Results
    U.S. Flights Delayed Due to Computer Glitch
    AOL Layoffs Could Cut Up to a Third of Workers
    Nielsen Forecasts Coal in Your Stocking
    Is Cloud Computing Ready to Rumble?
    New Mozilla Firefox 3.6 Beta Fixes 83 Bugs


  • Acceptable Use Policy

    internet.comMediabistrojusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

    WebMediaBrands Corporate Info


    Advertise | Newsletters | Feedback | Submit News

    Legal Notices | Licensing | Permissions | Privacy Policy


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
    Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Copyright 2002 Jupitermedia Corporation