Memory benchmarks (post your results) "sandra"

[gtr]

Int Alu/Ram bandwidth 596 MB/s
Float Fpu/Ram bandwidth 755 MB/s

sis 735 chip on ECS-k7s5a board.

The performance looks pretty close to others except for the intel 850 chips with ramdac.

[Bob The Great]

Int Alu/Ram bandwidth 413 MB/s
Float Fpu/Ram bandwidth 503 MB/s

I was onlin while doing the test, so results might be a little higher.

Kingston pc-2100 DDR ram on EPOX 8K7A

[Rhino302]

620
&
696

when I was at 933 mhz on this Morgan. At 1.2 ghz now, but I suppose it wont really help it

Epox 8K7A+
AMD 760
256 mb Crucial PC2100 @ cas 2.5


Edit:
Bob, if you flash to the 1824 BIOS, should help your memory although will lower your IDE performance.

[This message has been edited by Rhino302 (edited 09-11-2001).]

[Bob The Great]

Do you like it better? The IDE preformance is really inportant, but if it's worth it I'll do it. BTW my CPU is a duron 700Mhz at 950 (9.5x100). So I the 200Mhz memory speed. I can't oc my cpu anything over 115FSB. And I'm worried about messing up my PCI, and AGP slots doing that (It oc's them to). So That is the main reason my mem scores are so low. I just raised the cas to 2.5, and here are my new scores

Alu 446MB/s
Fpu 566Mb/s

I'm going to get a T-Bird 1.2 or more with a 266Mhz FSB soon. Then I should be getting great memory speeds http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif

[Rhino302]

Bob,

Cas 2.5 should have made your scores worse. They probably got a little better just cause you didnt have as many things open in the background or something. I always do ctrl-alt-del, and get rid of evertying but explorer and systray, and then close out the little programs i can in the systray

I had to get the new BIOS though, because this Morgan core wouldnt work all the way on teh old one

With the new BIOS, my HDD scores dropped from about 20,800 to 18,300.

I think I gained around 50 or so on the memory scores.

[Inanis]

726 ALU
616 FPU

PC133 SDRAM running at 140 MHZ

You can see pics at my website.
http://www.inanis.net

[This message has been edited by Inanis (edited 09-12-2001).]

[F4_Hunter]

564 ALU
709 FPU

I'm using Crucial PC2100 CL2.5 on a Epox 8K7A.

-F4

[dday]

Pretty new at this , but here they are.
ALU447
FPU528
On a kt7a raid , t-bird 900@1000 , 256mb/133

[jaida]

Heres my memory scores with an intel setup. bx board running at 143 fsb 2-2-2 using mushkin rev. 2.


http://members.home.net/ovclock/1001mem.jpg




I will be upgrading to amd setup very soon though ;)

[Potlicker]

515apu
585fpu
KT7A-Raid
512 @133
1.4 @ 1.6

[Sweeper]

1.2 Tbird @ 1.3 13x100
512mb PC133 Sdram Cas2 (256mb Mosel Vitalic, 256mb Micron)
Win.98se
ALU 456
FPU 521

[JayMan]

I would love to post mine, but i have sandra 2001te and it freezes when i ru the memory benchmark, but yet 2001se works fine with the memory benchmark. Perhaps 2001te just doesn't like 640MB PC133? Any idea's? Its generic PC133 ram in gigabyte GA-7ZXR board.

JayMan

[otheos]

Here's mine:
http://www.otheos.clara.net/pub/mem.jpg

That's with my old A7V 1.01, 512MB of Crucial CL2 PC133 RAM running at 151MHz (CPU running at 12.5x113). Not bad huh?

[Hunter]

ALU 642
FPU 792

K7S5A 7/24/01 BIOS
AMD 1.4 AYHJA- Y 133/133
CRUCIAL 256 DDR PC2100 FAST/2.5t/6t/3t

Still testing, still stable, still fast. I'm feelin lucky...

[JayMan]

Otheos, don't wanna sounds like i am competing or anything, but both sticks of my generic (128MB and 512MB) PC133 run @ 151 Mhz no worries, i guess i just got lucky hey. I would leave it clocked at that all the time (no probs with CPU), but my voodoo2's don't like the increased PCI speed, doh!

JayMan

[JCB]

ALU 583
FPU 663

That's 1 stick crucial SDRAM133, and 1 stick kingston valuram SDRAM133, set fastest, @ 145.

[NoLimitz]

These memory benchmarks look great. Is the benchmark software available for download ?

Thanks!
Andrew

[samwichse]

I've actually got two sets right now

ECS K7S5A w/ AMD Tbird 1ghz 133/133 cas 2 (ddr)
ALU 618
FPU 761

ECS K7S5A w AMD Tbird 1 ghz @ 1125 150/150 cas 2 (ddr)
ALU 699
FPU 860

I did a little calculation and the increase in FSB from 133->150 was 112.8%, the memory performance increases were 113.1%. Given I restarted and ran twice with an average for each speed, the performance increase is perfectly linear (the extra little bit is probably just measurement error).

Can someone with another chipset verify that this is true for all, or is the 735 even more hoss than I thought?

Note: sure wish I had some more voltage... the pencil trick is looking better and better.

[apgibbo]

Here's mine

1gig AXIA @ 1.4

140 meg bus

512 Mb of Crucial Cas2