Dputiger
08-21-2000, 08:17 AM
I'm a huge AMD fan--have been for years--but I started thinking about this last night and I'm really confused by it. Given the position that it's in, why is Intel being beaten by AMD?
Consider this: Intel has four times the manufacturing capacity of AMD (8 fabs vs. 2), a MUCH larger market presence and a much greater market, ships processors to more countries, and probably has an R&D budget as large as AMD's net income, if not larger.
Logically, Intel should have the edge on AMD in research, manufacturing, engineering, and implementation. Furthermore, it's not as if Intel makes bad chips--both the Pentium and Pentium II chips were absolutely fabulous designs, not to mention some of the earlier CPUs.
So, given all this, why is Intel increasingly on the defensive against a company which it should be dominating?
Consider this: Intel has four times the manufacturing capacity of AMD (8 fabs vs. 2), a MUCH larger market presence and a much greater market, ships processors to more countries, and probably has an R&D budget as large as AMD's net income, if not larger.
Logically, Intel should have the edge on AMD in research, manufacturing, engineering, and implementation. Furthermore, it's not as if Intel makes bad chips--both the Pentium and Pentium II chips were absolutely fabulous designs, not to mention some of the earlier CPUs.
So, given all this, why is Intel increasingly on the defensive against a company which it should be dominating?