Dputiger
07-07-2000, 10:54 PM
There's some interesting FPS differences between Sharky's and Tom's when they reviewed the 'Duron'--can someone explain these?
These are taken from both sites 'Quake III' benchmarks.
Duron 700
Sharky's: 85.5 FPS
Tom's: 116.4 FPS
Pentium III 700 EB
Sharky's: 107.3 FPS
Tom's: 132.2 FPS
Athlon 700 'Classic'
Sharky's: 98.9 FPS
Tom's: 116.3 FPS
Can someone explain to me why Sharky's FPS are consistently 15-20% lower then Tom's on all machines?
These are taken from both sites 'Quake III' benchmarks.
Duron 700
Sharky's: 85.5 FPS
Tom's: 116.4 FPS
Pentium III 700 EB
Sharky's: 107.3 FPS
Tom's: 132.2 FPS
Athlon 700 'Classic'
Sharky's: 98.9 FPS
Tom's: 116.3 FPS
Can someone explain to me why Sharky's FPS are consistently 15-20% lower then Tom's on all machines?