Has anyone seen this!!!!!!!!!

[GroundZero3]

oh wow i would love to hear what the linux users have to say about this. http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif


Jason

[daveleau]

lmao

Reality: Linux Makes No Sense at the Desktop

Linux as a desktop operating system makes no sense. A user would end up with a system that has fewer applications, is more complex to use and manage, and is less intuitive.


Dave

[NDC]

I would like to hear what CMonster has to say about this! http://www.sysopt.com/forum/wink.gif

[thekingofpain]

SHOCKING!!!

[rlpos]

But don't you think that this is typical car dealer logic. "Mine is always better than yours"

[Undeadlord]

I like the part about M$ saying Redhat makes there money by charging for tech support, like that is some horrible thing. Last time I checked M$ was still charging 40 bucks a pop to get a techie on the phone. And if M$ was giing away their software maybe I would pay 40 for tech support ....


Undeadlord

[pbharris]

check out some of the linux boards to see what linux users think about that. in a nutshell - we think this is another laod of *deleted* http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif


*edited for language*

[This message has been edited by Mntsnow (edited 06-04-2001).]

[dddave]

I love this part
Configuring Linux security requires an administrator to be an expert in the intricacies of the operating system and how components interact. Misconfigure any part of the operating system and the system could be vulnerable to attack. Windows NT security is easy to set up and administer with tools such as the Security Configuration Editor.


Yep with Windows all the security holes come preconfigured http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif

[otheos]

http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/news/msnw/LinuxMyths.asp

[Andy_L]

Quote "Linux does not provide support for the broad range of hardware in use today; Windows NT 4.0 currently supports over 39,000 systems and devices on the Hardware Compatibility List. Linux does not support important ease-of-use technologies such as Plug and Play, USB, and Power Management "

You mean I could have used my usb scanner, modem, wheelmouse, and Zip drive all along in WIN NT?? OH wait, thats right, NT doesnt support USB or Plug and Play either.

They fail to mention that Ms networking is based on UNIX networking.
Anyway, the comparison is old news, since the 2.2 kernel and NT 4.0 have both been replaced.

[NDC]

Windows NT4 doesn't support plug-and-play devices out of the box, but it can be configured to a least partially support some PnP features with a little help. http://www.sysopt.com/forum/wink.gif


http://pub51.ezboard.com/fxtreme89487frm15.showMessage?topicID=42.topic