//flex table opened by JP

Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Win98 FAT 32 and Win95 ???


frogpuff
02-22-1999, 08:29 PM
I have just added two pc's to a peer to peer network of 5 machines. The 2 new pc's are Win 98 FAT 32, the existing pc's are Win 95, not Fat 32. Will I have any problems sharing files from the older machines to the new ones?? Should I convert the old machines to FAT 32 now?? I have not seen any problems yet but I guess I would like to avoid any if possible. Thanks for any help you can offer.

Oliver Cook
02-23-1999, 07:17 AM
I don't think your going to run into any problems. It shouldn't make a difference.

jmeier
03-02-1999, 11:16 AM
I have recently run into problems with FAT32 and FAT16 in a perticular case. If you create an archive of any kind on the Fat32 volume and then transfer it to the Fat16 volume I wouldn't be surprised if you get CRC (cyclic redundency check) errors. If you transfer things like executables, text files, etc they should be ok.

kwai
03-03-1999, 03:17 AM
really? simple zip files and copying them across the network with windows explorer?

i guess you could work around it using ftp, but that would be a pain in the ****.

jmeier
03-04-1999, 01:47 PM
Kwai--> I've had problems with .zip files originally made on Fat32 that were greater than 1mb and then transfered to fat16. Those get corrupted about 90% of the time. With other compressions like .rar and .ace expect 100% corrupt. Yes, using FTP to transfer files does not corrupt them.

kwai
03-04-1999, 04:06 PM
interesting. thanks for the warning. yet another caveat from redmond.