easyrider
09-01-2000, 08:18 PM
q3, 1024x768 32 bit all, everything maxed out.
6.18=83fps
5.32=78fps
Thing is I was wondering about how much i would get an increase from oc'ing at any oc speed.
Well results were, NOT a **** bit a difference, NOT even .01fps difference SAME fps with it at 240/408 as default factory.
5.32's don't support oc'ing for the gf2 gts card , but 6.18's did, and that's what i clocked with. Back to the 5.32's though the 6.18's have some major issues!!!
Could play everything but NFS5, so decided to stick with the 5.32's till nvidia gets off it's *** and makes some REAL drivers!
So why oc?..who the hell knows, I see no difference, so why mess with it even?
Havn't done 3dmark yet.
Almost forgot to add system specs
Athlon 700
256 megs pc133 sdram
gf2 gts 64 meg DDR hercules
I tried this test at factory clock of 220 core/336 mem, all the way up to 240 core/408 mem, and saw not 1 fps difference, so again I ask why is it a big deal to oc?
[This message has been edited by easyrider (edited 09-01-2000).]
6.18=83fps
5.32=78fps
Thing is I was wondering about how much i would get an increase from oc'ing at any oc speed.
Well results were, NOT a **** bit a difference, NOT even .01fps difference SAME fps with it at 240/408 as default factory.
5.32's don't support oc'ing for the gf2 gts card , but 6.18's did, and that's what i clocked with. Back to the 5.32's though the 6.18's have some major issues!!!
Could play everything but NFS5, so decided to stick with the 5.32's till nvidia gets off it's *** and makes some REAL drivers!
So why oc?..who the hell knows, I see no difference, so why mess with it even?
Havn't done 3dmark yet.
Almost forgot to add system specs
Athlon 700
256 megs pc133 sdram
gf2 gts 64 meg DDR hercules
I tried this test at factory clock of 220 core/336 mem, all the way up to 240 core/408 mem, and saw not 1 fps difference, so again I ask why is it a big deal to oc?
[This message has been edited by easyrider (edited 09-01-2000).]