tcul72
08-27-2000, 10:39 AM
which should i get? rage fury maxx 64meg is 148 dollars, and prophet2 mx is 129 dollars.
which is the better card?
which is the better card?
| //flex table opened by JP
Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : ATI RAGE FURY MAXX [64MB] AGP or 3D PROPHET2 Geforce 2 MX tcul72 08-27-2000, 10:39 AM which should i get? rage fury maxx 64meg is 148 dollars, and prophet2 mx is 129 dollars. which is the better card? Shnak 08-27-2000, 10:51 AM the MAXX can edge the MX on certain benchmarks, but overall, the MX is a better pick, drivers, etc. get a cheap MX instead Shnak tcul72 08-27-2000, 11:34 AM thanks, i was leaning towards the geforce2 mx anyway. has anyone had much overclocking success with the 3d prophet2 mx card? i have an extra heatsink/fan i will put on it. mad hampster 08-27-2000, 05:13 PM Overclocking the memory would most likely give an enormous speed boost on that puppy, dont know the sucess levels though. Ruahrc 08-27-2000, 11:21 PM I have an MX and love it. It's a VisionTek 32MB card with no heatsinks or fans. (!) I left the core alone- but overclocked the memory from 166 to 200Mhz. No problems whatsoever. Performance- in 3DMark2000 I got a 10% increase in 1024x768x16-bit and a 30% increase in 1024x768x32-bit. Keep in mind though, that the original tests were run with the 5.33 drivers and the o/c tests were run with the Det3's. The new drivers came out right when I tested the overclocking. The Demo mode was noticeably faster in 32-bit mode even with FSAA on. The nVidia Alien Demo runs fluidly smooth at 1024x768x32. I recommend the card. Ruahrc Wilan Wong 08-31-2000, 04:18 AM I say go for the GeForce 2 MX card, it's better value and overclocks better. But the MAXX has an advantage when it comes to higher resolutions and higher detailed textures. SysOpt.com
Copyright Internet.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |