BBA
06-06-1999, 02:29 PM
Yep, last night, One PC, a Celeron with a CL TNT2 Ultra, the other, a P2 450 V3 3000. The TNT clocked to 175/200, the V3 166.
The TNT2 rocks! Were talkin faster than V2 SLI at any res, in fact the TNT2 did 1280x1024 as fast as the V2 did 1024x768, and it runs the crusher demo at 1600x1200 at 31fps... not too shabby, you can play smoothly like that, but the monitor size kept us liking 1280x1024.
The V3 did just a little better than the V2 SLI, and looked the same, but you could use higher than 1024x768, just not as smoothly.
Oh... another thing, the CL Ultra has the 5nsec ram chips, all the others have 5.5 or 6nsec chips, so looks like the CL may be better after all.
BBA
The TNT2 rocks! Were talkin faster than V2 SLI at any res, in fact the TNT2 did 1280x1024 as fast as the V2 did 1024x768, and it runs the crusher demo at 1600x1200 at 31fps... not too shabby, you can play smoothly like that, but the monitor size kept us liking 1280x1024.
The V3 did just a little better than the V2 SLI, and looked the same, but you could use higher than 1024x768, just not as smoothly.
Oh... another thing, the CL Ultra has the 5nsec ram chips, all the others have 5.5 or 6nsec chips, so looks like the CL may be better after all.
BBA