EdgeDS
05-13-2001, 07:13 AM
Been reading for awhile, thought I'd jump in.
System specs:
Win98SE
300W power supply
Celeron 600
Asus CUV4X
ATI Radeon VE, AGP version, with 2 Plug & Play monitors attached
256M PC133 Mitsubishi RAM
Alpha PEP66 heatsink with Arctic Silver thermal grease
IBM IDE hard drive, U/ATA 100
SB PCI512 sound card
Linksys Fast ethernet card
56K PCI Lite modem
Delta 52X CD-Rom
Ideally I'd like to get the processor to run at 900, which from what I've read, shouldn't stress any of the components I've listed.
The motherboard has a Jumperfree option which allows changes to be made to the VCore voltage and FSB from BIOS. Unfortunately it only allows FSB settings of 66, 100, and 133 through BIOS - I've tried voltages of 1.5 to 1.8 (the max allowed in the BIOS version I have), but setting the FSB to 100 won't get the system to post with any of those voltages.
Manual DIP switch settings allow FSB settings of 66, 68, 75, 80, 83, 100, 103, 105, 112, etc. When I bought the board I didn't really comprehend how much of a gap 83 to 100 is, heh.
75, 80, and 83 all push the AGP and PCI speeds a bit higher than I'd like, and although they all boot, 83 isn't stable (haven't tried the other two for long periods of time, but I'm guessing they're similar). What I can't seem to do is change the voltage settings off the default 1.5V anywhere, any way, when I manually set the FSB.
So, finally, the questions:
- Would it be worth the time to get a new version of BIOS to try voltages over 1.8?
- After finding nothing in the manual or website on manually changing voltage settings, is there some resource I'm blatantly overlooking?
- The motherboard is rated for processor speeds of "800 or more"...does this sound like a case where the "or more" isn't going to happen, and a new mobo would be the only solution to reaching 100 FSB?
- If 75 or 80 FSB are more stable than 83 (the most intense usage I have is an occasional game of Starcraft), would the AGP/PCI speeds based on those FSB speeds cause any components to work less efficiently?
Thanks
Scott
System specs:
Win98SE
300W power supply
Celeron 600
Asus CUV4X
ATI Radeon VE, AGP version, with 2 Plug & Play monitors attached
256M PC133 Mitsubishi RAM
Alpha PEP66 heatsink with Arctic Silver thermal grease
IBM IDE hard drive, U/ATA 100
SB PCI512 sound card
Linksys Fast ethernet card
56K PCI Lite modem
Delta 52X CD-Rom
Ideally I'd like to get the processor to run at 900, which from what I've read, shouldn't stress any of the components I've listed.
The motherboard has a Jumperfree option which allows changes to be made to the VCore voltage and FSB from BIOS. Unfortunately it only allows FSB settings of 66, 100, and 133 through BIOS - I've tried voltages of 1.5 to 1.8 (the max allowed in the BIOS version I have), but setting the FSB to 100 won't get the system to post with any of those voltages.
Manual DIP switch settings allow FSB settings of 66, 68, 75, 80, 83, 100, 103, 105, 112, etc. When I bought the board I didn't really comprehend how much of a gap 83 to 100 is, heh.
75, 80, and 83 all push the AGP and PCI speeds a bit higher than I'd like, and although they all boot, 83 isn't stable (haven't tried the other two for long periods of time, but I'm guessing they're similar). What I can't seem to do is change the voltage settings off the default 1.5V anywhere, any way, when I manually set the FSB.
So, finally, the questions:
- Would it be worth the time to get a new version of BIOS to try voltages over 1.8?
- After finding nothing in the manual or website on manually changing voltage settings, is there some resource I'm blatantly overlooking?
- The motherboard is rated for processor speeds of "800 or more"...does this sound like a case where the "or more" isn't going to happen, and a new mobo would be the only solution to reaching 100 FSB?
- If 75 or 80 FSB are more stable than 83 (the most intense usage I have is an occasional game of Starcraft), would the AGP/PCI speeds based on those FSB speeds cause any components to work less efficiently?
Thanks
Scott