3DMark2001 Scores

[Jmc_uk]

Post em here ppl

T-Bird 850 @ 980Mhz (9.5*103)
Super Orb @ 40C Full Load
256MB 133mhz M-Tec CAS2 RAM
AZ11e FIC Mainboard (beauty)
GeForce2 GTS 32MB @ Standard
Maxtor UDMA 100 40Gb

WinME + DX8a
REF 1080 Driver Set
Via 4in1 4.29

3DMark = 3250

[Ultima]

Well, with the following setup:

Abit kt7-raid
Duron 800@990 (110Mhz fsb)
Globalwin fop38
256Mb 143Mhz cl2
Geforce256 DDR 32Mb (agp at 70Mhz)
Quantum 18.2Gb ata66 on ata100 controller.

Windows 98 Second Edition + DX8a
Reference drivers 6.37 I think
Via 4in1 4.25a drivers

3DMark score at default: 2713

[Mistr2]

Specs...

P3 800@935
128MB RAM
Asus GF2 MX 32MB (200/205)
Direct X 8a
Win ME
11.00 Drivers
20GB WD 7200RPM

3D Mark 2001 = 2423

[Sweeper]

850 T-Bird (not overclocked)
K7T Pro2 (MS-6330) MB
GF 2 MX
Win. 98 SE
2 Maxtor UDMA66 13.6 gig
256 pc133

3DMark Score 2462


[This message has been edited by Sweeper (edited 03-20-2001).]

[Tom Pico]

I can get my PIII to 1015MHz but 3DMark 2001 doesn't like 145FSB and crashed. At 140FSB everything ok. My specs:

PIII 700@980 (140FSB)
Abit SE6, 512MB PC133 cas2
Asus 7100 GeForce MX2, Nvida 6.50 driver

3DMark 2001 at default (175/166) core/memory clock settings:

1024x768x32 - 1841
1024x768x16 - 2156

3DMark 2001 at 210 core/210 memory clock settings:

1024x768x32 - 2095
1024x768x16 - 2338

At core clock settings obove 210MHz 3DMark locked up, so 210MHz is it for me.

[JayMan]

Here goes, havent played around to get highest score possible yet (tweaked my geforce2 o/c), so could be better than this i reckon, but anyways:

Tbird 1Ghz @ 1.1Ghz (10*110)
superorb to cool it.
128MB PC133 @cas3
GA-7ZXR mobo
Prophet II PRO @220mhz core/440mhz mem (7.52 herc drivers)
20Gig ATA-66
Win98se
latest 4in1's

3dmark2k1 score = 3158 with the standard test

Anybody know why jmc_uk got a higher score than me? he has more ram, and faster HD, but i got faster CPU and faster video (more vid ram too). Perhaps his 256MB cas2 is whats doing it.

JayMan

[AndreRIO]

athlon tbird 900mhz (not oc)
128mb ram
elsa gladiac geforce2 mx
wd 40gb hd 7200rpm ata100
win me os (directx 8.0a, via 4in1 4.29)
3dmark 2000=7003
3dmark 2001=2402

[Ultima]

AndreRio,

at what resolution did ya get that score in 3dmark2000??? 800x600??

Cause frankly, that can't be at 1024x768.

I got a score of 5500 at most with a system, which is in all but 1 way, higher speeded then yours.

I have a duron 800@1100 (10 x 110)
256Mb @ 143Mhz
Geforce256 DDR
18.2Gb ata66 disk
and win98se with dx8
latest 4in1 drivers

So, only yer hd is faster, and yet, you score 1500 more then me.
SO, that's why I wonder at what resolution did you test it???

Ultima

[NRG]

Duron 700 @ 900 (100 X 9.0)
Abit KT7A-Raid
384 MB Ram pc 133
20 GB ATA66 HDD
Geforce 2 mx 32mb (standard speed but with abit North bridge cooling fan)
1024 X 768 res
Win ME
latest 4 in 1 via drivers
3D Mark 2000=4219

[AndreRIO]

i test on 640x480 resolution http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif
and on 1024x768 4457 http://www.sysopt.com/forum/wink.gif

[This message has been edited by AndreRIO (edited 03-21-2001).]

[cin587]

ok specs:

AMD Duron 700 @ 900
160 MB SDRAM PC100
Geforce 2 MX 32MB RAM
15 GIG HD ( i think 5400 rpm ATA 66)
ABIT KT7a RAID mobo

3D mark 2001 score: 1945

i wanna know why the hell my score is so low....... i run at 1024x768 16bit color

[AndreRIO]

1st, the duron is not as fast as the tbird i think
2nd, you got to install via 4in1 4.29 driver (www.viahardware.com), download this driver will make your system run faster

[This message has been edited by AndreRIO (edited 03-21-2001).]

[This message has been edited by AndreRIO (edited 03-21-2001).]

[cin587]

I have version 4.28 drivers is there much of a change? I also had to install the agp drivers in normal instead of turbo mode to fix a comp freeze prob in openGL

[AndreRIO]

new in 4.29:

1.Update Via inf version 1.20a .( Add Via inf catalog file )
2.Update via ide miniport driver 3.011 to via pci ide driver 1.04 in win2k
Note:
Support Feature.
1.Windows 2000 candidate version
If you only install Windows 2000 candidate version, the MS IDE Driver limit the ATA100 feature and only support up to ATA66. It will switch the operation mode of ATA100 mode to PIO mode. After Install Filter Driver, the operation mode of ATA100 device will be decreased to ATA66 only, not to PIO mode.
2.Windows 2000 candidate version plus Service Pack 2
If you install Windows 2000 Service Pack2, the MS IDE Driver begin to support ATA100 feature.The ATA100 device could work with ATA100 mode really.

[This message has been edited by AndreRIO (edited 03-21-2001).]

[This message has been edited by AndreRIO (edited 03-21-2001).]

[AndreRIO]

Post em here ppl http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif

[gyoung]

Duron 600 @ 884 (8.5*104)
384MB 133MHz Crucial CAS2 RAM (138Mhz)
Abit KT7-RAID
Radeon 32MB DDR (166/166)
IBM 30GB Deskstar

Win98SE + DX8a
Via 4in1 4.28
Radeon Driver 7072

Default 3DMarks = 3018
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?510814

[gyoung]

i test on 640x480 resolution
and on 1024x768 4457

AndreRIO, are you saying you got 4457 on 3DMark2000 or 3DMark2001? I'm assuming 3DMark2000, right?

[gyoung]

Duron 700 @ 900 (100 X 9.0)
Abit KT7A-Raid
384 MB Ram pc 133
20 GB ATA66 HDD
Geforce 2 mx 32mb (standard speed but with abit North bridge cooling fan)
1024 X 768 res
Win ME
latest 4 in 1 via drivers
3D Mark 2000=4219


NRG, why aren't you running that Duron with the 133MHz bus? I've heard it helps to run both the memory and the bus at 133MHz.

[AndreRIO]

3dmark2000! http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif 1024x768 4427

[BBA]

Hmmm...P3 650 dual, W2K GF2 Ultra...Default 32 bit everything...

3DMark 2K1 --- 2135

Of course, 3DMrak2K default 32 bit is 6500.

I think the benchmark is not very reliable for different type cards. It must depend on certain types of support more than others.

Especially because I know many GF2MX users who cant hold a candle to my GF2 Ultra in gameplay...even with their 1 GHz machines.

[david42018]

i dont trust soem peoples scores. like an P3850 with Geforece 2 getting like 3200...NOT. some people probly have their 3D Mark settings turned down like the Res. and so forth. i only got a 3000 with defaulta 3D mark settings and tweaked Geforce 2w/ settings like Z buffering turned off. i have a T-Bird 1000@1285 Geforce 2 tweaked memory and core, 256MB of PC133 APACER RAM. Some ppl arent honest!!

[BBA]

I'm with you David...

[DanU]

Welcome to the internet http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif

Even screen-shots aren't trustworthy. HardOCP has a blurb on people "photoshopping" their sandra results to get a 3-gig T-bird. It's obvious that no one has a 3gig T-bird!

[Wilan Wong]

My config is:
Duron 800@902 (112 x 8)
384Mb PC133 SDRAM
GeForce2 MX Gigabyte @ 210core/200mem
Windows 2000 Pro
20gb WD 7200RPM ATA-100 Drive

3DMark2001 Score (Default): 2201
3DMark2000 Score (Default): 5152

[Jmc_uk]

So you dont believe me then?

how can i prove it?

[chiller]

PIII 850 (slot1)
ATI 64 DDR
win 98 (1st edition)
ATA33 6 gig HDD
BH6 mobo
512 PC 133 (crucial)
not overclocked (yet)

mark 2000=4914
on 1024+768+16

[Wilan Wong]

For some reason, when I overclocked my Duron from 800 to just an 880, I achieved a 200+ 3DMark score (3DMark2001). The GeForce2 MX settings were all the same, and were both o/c'ed to 210core/200mem. Anyone else, tried o/c and don't o/c as much like an 100-150MHz see how much difference in score you get, is it just my score that is weird??

[BBA]

Drivers are amazing...

I just loaded the detonator 10.80 drivers...and my score went from 2135 with 7.54 drivers all the way up to 2358.

I still think it's kicking for a 650 MHZ machine.

[Wilan Wong]

I actually got higher scores from going back from the newest Win2k drivers (10.something) to the 6.72 drivers.

[BBA]

Hmmm...maybe it's less video dependant and more cpu dependant.

I see where everyone with a Gigahertz and just about any vid card ( GF2MX/GF DDR/GF2GTS ) are getting in the low to mid 3000's and those with slower cpu's ( 600-800 ) are getting from low to mid 2000's, regardless of the vid card.

I think that because my vid card ( GF2 Ultra ) should definitely kick the pants off ANY other video card out yet, and it does when playing games.

I know for a fact that there is not another video card yet that will run 100 FPS in Q3 at 1280x1024, other than mine, and definitely none any of the 32M cards will come anywhere close, no matter what CPU is behind them.

[Gossamer]

T-Bird C 1000 @ 1050Mhz (140*7.5)
Volcano II @ 45C Full Load
256MB Kingmax PC150 (running at 2-2-2)
Abit KT7A-Raid
2-WD UDMA 100 20Gb Raid 1
Inno3D Geforce2 MX 32meg oc 200/200
Enermax 430watt

Win98SE + DX8a
10.80 Driver Set
Via 4in1 4.29a

3DMark2001
1024x768 16bit 3053
1024x768 32bit 2531

3DMark 2001 settings for 1024x768 16bit
Frame Buffer:Triple
Z-Buffer: 16 bit
Hardware T&L
Antialiasing: off
MidMap Detail Level: Blend
Texture Format: Compressed
V-Sync: Disabled

3dMark 2001 settings for 1024x768 32bit
Z-Buffer: 24 bit
All other settings stayed same.

I think the scores are where I'm supposed to be in terms of my hardware.

[bibibibi]

AMD 1242/276-ASUS A7V133-384mb VCM
ATI Radeon 64 MB DDR VIVO 189Mhz core spped and Mem Syncrone.
WinMe-DX 8.0
Raid-On Tweaker 4.4
ATI Driver version xx89

3DMark 2001 (Proffesional)
With quality test enablet.
1024x768x32
32bit Z-buffer
Texture Compression on
Every thing set to max Quality.


3486 Points.

The system is optimized for High Quality alone.

And i promise you all that it looks like a dream.

[This message has been edited by bibibibi (edited 03-29-2001).]

[quickening]

1.0GHz oc 1.1GHz tbird
abit kt7-raid
leadtek geforce2 pro (not oc) detonator v10.8
ibm 75GXP on non-raid controller.
256 Mb PC133CS2 SDRAM
--> all acceleration options turned on in bios softmenu
win98SE
default 1024x768x32 3DMark2001 => 3465

amusingly, this system is much faster on all benchmarks in Sissoft Sandra than a p4-1.5Ghz (except memory bench of course)

still tweaking! does anyone use winfox (leadtek's overclocking utility)? If I change the memory speed even 1 MHz, the computer locks up.

[This message has been edited by quickening (edited 03-29-2001).]

[samwichse]

I wonder if mine is a bit low. Any suggestions?

Athlon classic 750mhz
128 mb of cas3 ram (PC133)
10.2Gb 7200rpm UDMA66 hard drive
ATI Xpert 2000 32Mb video ram (cpu/memory oc'd to 110/125)
Epox with via KX133 chipset
Windows 95 (B) with Via 4 in 1 1.25 drivers
3DMark2000 (not 2001) score: 1720
score at stock (90/90mhz) video clock: 1324

[Barney]

Buy a new videocard and overclock your processor. http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif

Here's what I have:

Athlon 750 NOT overclocked http://www.sysopt.com/forum/frown.gif , 3Dmark locks up otherwise. Gotta get that 1.2gig soon. http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif
192mb memory @100mhz CAS3 (darn PC66 stick)
Elsa Erazor X GF256 SDR @ 135/170mhz
Maxtor 10gig 7200rpm

1024x768x16bit: 2134
800x600x16bit: 2281
640x480x16bit: 2357

1280x1024x32bit (awesome! http://www.sysopt.com/forum/wink.gif ): 1249

Ronald http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gif

[Detemeat]

Here's what I got for 3D mark 2001:
***********************************

Operating System Microsoft Windows 2000
DirectX Version 8.00

Mobo Manufacturer <http://www.abit.com.tw>
Mobo Model i440BX-W83977 (BE6)

CPU Intel Pentium III 651 Mhz
FSB 100 MHz

3D Accelerator NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS/GeForce2 Pro
Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS/Pro
Driver Version 5.13.01.1101
Video Memory 64 MB

Resolution 1024x768 32bit
Texture Format Compressed
FSAA Disabled
Z-Buffer Depth 24bit
Frame Buffer Double
Rendering Pipeline D3D Hardware T&L



3DMark Result 2378 3D marks

Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 49.6 FPS
Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 11.9 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 39.4 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 14.6 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 50.7 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 22.6 FPS
Game 4 Nature N/A FPS

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 271.6 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 514.1 MTexels/s

High Polygon Count (1 light) 15.5 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 lights) 2.9 MTriangles/s

Environment Bump Mapping N/A FPS
DOT3 Bump Mapping 41.5 FPS

Vertex Shader Speed 19.6 FPS
Pixel Shader Speed N/A FPS
Point Sprite Speed 7.1 MSprites/s
*********************************
I'll see what I get for a score in a week when I install my new hardware I ordered:
AMD "Thunderbird" Athlon-C 1333MHz
Samsung PC-2100 DDR 256MB
and ASUS A7M266 motherboard
Dete

[samwichse]

Well, I have a little more respect for this video card, cause I got a little program called rageclk and it's now clocked at 114/140mhz. That with the newest via drivers gives me an 1839 in 3DMark2000, 139% of what it was before, which seems like a pretty good deal, 39% performance increase with only a 27% increase in GPU clock. Now I have the choice of running Unreal in either 800X600X32 or 1024X768X16 when the best I could do and be decent was 800X600X16 before. Whoohoo.

If only I could afford a new video card and a gf device... but I can't even afford a cheap little h/s and fan to cool the now toasty warm GPU on the one I've got.

[This message has been edited by samwichse (edited 03-29-2001).]

[giant69]

Here's what I got for 3D mark 2001:
***********************************
3DMark Result 1939 3D marks

Operating System Microsoft Windows 2000
DirectX Version 8.00

Mobo Manufacturer <http://www.abit.com.tw>
Mobo Model i440BX-W83977 (BE6)

CPU Intel Pentium III 770 Mhz
FSB 140 MHz

3D Accelerator NVIDIA GeForce 256
Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce SDR
Driver Version 5.13.01.1101
Video Memory 32 MB

Resolution 1024x768 32bit
Texture Format Compressed
FSAA Disabled
Z-Buffer Depth 24bit
Frame Buffer Double
Rendering Pipeline D3D Hardware T&L

Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 32.0 FPS
Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 12.9 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 30.8 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 13.2 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 38.2 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 20.4 FPS
Game 4 Nature N/A FPS

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 189.8 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 356.3 MTexels/s

High Polygon Count (1 light) 8.4 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 lights) 1.8 MTriangles/s

Environment Bump Mapping N/A FPS
DOT3 Bump Mapping 29.7 FPS

Vertex Shader Speed 21.1 FPS
Pixel Shader Speed N/A FPS
Point Sprite Speed 5.6 MSprites/s

I picked up 300 points going from 6.50 drivers to 11.01 !!Time to start tweaking my vid. card again...steve

[Ruahrc]

I heard that the Nature test doesn't run on everyone's systems because 3DM2K1 checks for a "DX8- compliant" card. Yet when you run the demo the Nature game's segment runs just fine. I wish they released a patch to allow the running of the Nature scene- it's obvious the thing will run, just not necessarily as good.

Anyone with me?

Ruahrc

[BBA]

So is any card DX8 compliant? Is the only one yet the GF3?

[JayMan]

At the moment i think only the gf3 is actually DX8 compliant, GF2 radeon etc... are only DX8 compatable (driver compatabilty, not full hardware compatability).

I have just done some more tweaking on the above system, now have athlon 1120Mhz (112x10). Geforce2 PRO o/ced to 215/440 (could go higher i think but thats all for now). detonator 11.01 drivers, all else is same as above (above i've got my gf2 o/ced more hehe don't ask my why i didn't go to the same amount this time, oops, so could probably ad a few more points to my score too)

new 3dmark 2001 score: 4203 whoo hoo

JayMan

[FrozenLiquidity]

3DMark2001 eh? Why do I feel like I jsut got a big "F" on some final exam?

[BBA]

I think I need that dual 1.2G AMD machine more than a GF3 then...CPU speed seems to make a bigger difference than video card type.

How do you think my Ultra will do at 280/490 with a 1.2G smp machine? Might hit 5K?

Come on...I need that motherboard ( Abit )

[JayMan]

just going over the scores posted here, i've got the highest sofar posted. Yay! Surely someone out there with a ultra card can beat this since i only have a pro.

JayMan

[NDC]

Dual P3 800 @ 897Mhz, Leadtek Geforce DDR 32MB W/ 11.01 driver (No OC), Win2k.


1024x786 32bit = 2497

[NDC]

OK, back to V.10.80.... 11.01 was giving me lockups on Motocross Madness 2.

[BBA]

Wait until I get a faster CPU...then I think I'll be on top. ( Since I DO have an Ultra. )

[BBA]

Ummm...How can you run your C2 at 800MHz with 66 MHZ AND 100 MHZ bus?

I thought all C2's were multiplier locked.

[Keermalec]

GeForce 256 SGRAM (Asus V6600). Celeron II system with 384 Mb SDRAM and Windows 98. Can only use 6.31 drivers because Asus hasn't come out with anything more recent and the Nvidia drivers dont take into account my video in/out features.

Celeron @ 533/66 3dMark2001: 1164
Celeron @ 666/83 3dMark2001: 1430
Celeron @ 800/100 3dMark2001: 1596
Celeron @ 880/110 3dMark2001: 1674

To me this means the test is as dependent on CPU as it is on the graphics card. Now for a same CPU speed I changed memory speed:

Celeron @ 800/66 3dMark2001: 1397
Celeron @ 800/100 3dMark2001: 1596
Celeron @ 800/133 3dMark2001: 1643

So memory speed has an important effect on this test too. If 3dMark2001 really relates to gaming, then we really are going to see a performance boost with fast DDR SDRAM after all. I wonder if anyone has run this with DDR SDRAM or RDRAM already:

[deore101]

My score on 3-D Mark 2001:

Specs-

MSI K7T Pro2-A
T-Bird 1.2Ghz
Elsa Gladiac GeForce 2 GTS 32Mb
256Mb PC-133
Win 98 OS
Using Detonator Driver 11.0
DirectX 8.0

1024x768x32(Default): 2650

Still playing around with it, looking for more...

[This message has been edited by deore101 (edited 04-02-2001).]

[This message has been edited by deore101 (edited 04-04-2001).]

[darrell]

ok here are my specs:

486/DX2 66 mhz (not overclocked)
8MB RAM
100MB hard drive
geforce2 MX AGP (not overclocked)

3dmark 2000 (1024x768x16) score: 15,823
3dmark 2001 (1024x768x32) score 6,546

I have proof of this score, i really do. (thanks to photoshop...)

Ok anyone who isnt smoking crack believe this score? thought so... Why cant we all just post the DEFAULT benchmark scores? I just got my first Geforce card (Leadtek Winfast Geforce2 MX DH Pro) and i been reading the posts trying to make sense of what scores to expect so i know i got it tweaked correctly. So please lets just post default scores so new GF owners have some idea what to expect out of their cards...

My real specs and score (so far)

Abit BH6
celeron 566@850
192MB PC133 Cas2
Maxtor 30GB 5400rpm (running at ATA 33)
Leadtek Winfast Geforce2 MX DH Pro (o/c to 200/210)

3DMark 2000 (DEFAULT 1024x768x16): 4880
3DMark 2001 (DEFAULY 1024x768x32): 2003

i think thats about all im gonna get out of it. The Leadtek official drivers 4.12.01.0648 drivers are working the best for me.

darrell

[camaro]

800TBird
262MB
Asus A7V
Visiontek Geforce2MX

Default 3dmark2001 - 1969

[Kuasimodem]

3DMark2000 Results
5033 3D marks
CPU Speed
376 CPU 3D marks

Game 1 - Helicopter - Low Detail
103.2 FPS
Game 1 - Helicopter - Medium Detail
72.1 FPS
Game 1 - Helicopter - High Detail
31.3 FPS
Game 2 - Adventure - Low Detail
106.9 FPS
Game 2 - Adventure - Medium Detail
65.8 FPS
Game 2 - Adventure - High Detail
40.2 FPS

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing)
267.5 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing)
558.0 MTexels/s

High Polygon Count (1 Light)
9995.7 KTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (4 Lights)
7008.3 KTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights)
4744.4 KTriangles/s

8MB Texture Rendering Speed
285.6 FPS
16MB Texture Rendering Speed
274.8 FPS
32MB Texture Rendering Speed
180.6 FPS
64MB Texture Rendering Speed
93.1 FPS

Bump Mapping (Emboss 3-pass)
313.8 FPS
Bump Mapping (Emboss 2-pass)
163.6 FPS
Bump Mapping (Emboss 1-pass)
156.2 FPS
Bump Mapping (Environment)
115.5 FPS

AMD 900 T-bird (Super Orb, yes it will fit)
Abit KT7-RAID mobo
512Mb Micron PC133 CAS3
2 30Gb WD ATA100 (RAID 0)
ATI Radeon LE (clocked and tweaked, 175Mhz)
8x DVD
Acer CDRW4432A

I figure I could have gotten a higher score, but I set the card for quality, not using performance tweaks that hurt quality.



[This message has been edited by Kuasimodem (edited 04-05-2001).]

[Starbuck]

3dmark2001, default 1024(32)= 3430

1.0 T-Bird(266) @ 1.33 (10*133)
KT7A Raid
Elsa GeForce 2 GTS 32MB
256MB NEC PC133
Windows 98

[This message has been edited by Starbuck (edited 04-09-2001).]

[This message has been edited by Starbuck (edited 04-09-2001).]

[NDC]

3DMark2001, default 1024(32)= 2958
Dual P3 @ 897Mhz
Suma Geforce GTS SE 64MB default 200/400
DirectX 8
Windows 2000