//flex table opened by JP

Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : speed speed and more speed 400@798


hot cpu
03-28-2000, 08:29 PM
400amd k6-2All there is to it was to open the chip and cut two traces and jump one runs at 35c-40c settings are 133*6 stable and fast This is the best oc yet will post a pic of work soon !!!!peace

oblivion
03-28-2000, 08:37 PM
I do not believe you

Tracker
03-28-2000, 08:39 PM
I call BS on that one there is now way you doubled the speed like that, we most diffently need proof there or this is just BS!!

Missing the point
03-28-2000, 08:57 PM
This is BS. This is his first post, and I really truly don't believe him. Even if he gets a Mobo monitor pic, I still won't believe it, because look at this.

http://www.angelfire.com/me2/experimentplace/Cheatreal.jpg


That is a P III 500 (non coppermine CPU), running at 620. Mobo monitor screws up a lot, and Sisoft sandra is just plain simple to forge. I can make a unbelievable score is Sisoft sandra in a matter of minutes.

[This message has been edited by Missing the point (edited 03-28-2000).]

skywalker[TSG]
03-28-2000, 10:46 PM
hmm god **** lier

hmmm plz close this post before we get ugly with his ***
this is no place for BS !

jadison
03-29-2000, 05:46 AM
he might be right...but u better prove urself junior!!

-jd-

krusty the klown
03-29-2000, 06:09 AM
Yeah, that sounds like total skcollob 2 me. We're all living in democratic countries, so that means guilty till proven innocent.....prove it!!!!!!!!

akaBruno
03-29-2000, 06:49 AM
Well well, a lot of pessimism out there. Now just what is cut and jumped? It's easy to say not my chip. Let's wait and see. It could turn out to be something worth while. I'm interested in finding out more.

alpha
03-29-2000, 07:02 AM
BS BS BS BS BS BS BS BS BS BS

Missing the point
03-29-2000, 07:15 AM
Not even the BEst overclocking CPU out there can even get cose to what he is saying. The infamous Celeron coudn't even get close to doing that! Thats 2 off 800, and theres no way a AMD K6-2 could double its speed.


BSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBS BSBSBSBSBSBSBS

neo_otyugh
03-29-2000, 08:44 AM
should be interesting to see what is actually the result of this...and when i took the cap off of a k6 chip i was not able to see anything that could be cut and jumpered...

jerryt
03-29-2000, 09:09 AM
WoW Thats THe fastest k6 i heard of !!!!!!!!

alpha
03-29-2000, 09:10 AM
yeah. pity it isn't true

eagle1
03-29-2000, 10:23 AM
OOOOOHHH NNNOOOOO !!!!

Can you believe this??? I took my AMD K6 2 chip out of it's socket, I made a big cut to it, I jumped on it and now that I'm putting it back, IT DOESN'T WOORRKK !!!!


NNNNOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!

bhess
03-29-2000, 11:12 AM
trolling.......fish on!

Missing the point
03-29-2000, 04:08 PM
ya notice how he doesn't ever reply to his post? I would be answering everything if I got that to work at that speed!

drojman
03-29-2000, 05:27 PM
He must be too busy changing Ice buckets in his water cooler to keep it from burning up... or maybe playing q3 at 500fps...
What a buncha ****...

drojman
03-29-2000, 05:29 PM
HEY, that was his first and only post. He probably isn't even a real person... just someone causin trouble.

jokostel
03-29-2000, 09:42 PM
lets just end this stuff its **** like this that ruins a bbs...BS HAS NO PLACE IN IT.
this is a place of computer knowlegde not heresay...
lets shut this down asap and not waste another keystroke for em...
jokostel

jerryt
03-30-2000, 07:28 PM
i have heard things like chip mods but mostly with bootleg chips

hot cpu
03-31-2000, 03:53 PM
Just give me a chance to take some pics of my work before you go calling me a liar! Have some respect!

sparkywrz
03-31-2000, 06:45 PM
DONT THINK I DONT KNOW ANYTHING BECAUSE IM A
JUNIOR MEMBER
but this guy is a LIAR
BSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB
bs
and to conclude you can't double a k6 speed
B friggin S
ill wait for the pic

Missing the point
03-31-2000, 07:14 PM
Look up at the top, theres a forged picture, and if you want more, just post it that you want to see it, and I can show you a Sisoft sandra Forgery done by me. I am making these to make people aware that it is easy to be fooled.

alpha
04-01-2000, 03:02 AM
WE DO NOT BELIEVE YOU
The phiysical boundries of the .25uM k6-2 core make that impossible, even with two 100watt TECs and water cooling.

Stop spamming this message board - it is a place of learning and discussion.

otheos
04-01-2000, 03:12 AM
Hey, give the guy a brake, cause he might be mislead himself. Don't be rude, and don't try to patronize anyone. He's got something to show to us. When he does we deside what went wrong since it is obvious that there is no way to go that high. This is a civilised BBS and I think we can avoid the middleage behavior of "burn the witch".

RADAR1797
04-01-2000, 03:17 AM
If he weighs the same as a duck, he must be a witch.... ;-)

-RADAR

krusty the klown
04-01-2000, 06:43 AM
A witch????????????

Burn them!!!!!!

(it's a fair cop)

EDIT:

SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[This message has been edited by krusty the klown (edited 04-01-2000).]

sparkywrz
04-01-2000, 01:33 PM
ill have to agree with krusty there

psyklone
04-01-2000, 01:47 PM
well if he's actually ever popped the cap on a K6 he'd at least have the decency to try and make his lie look authentic ... there are no visible 'traces' to cut.

chipbgt
04-01-2000, 10:53 PM
Looks like they are still waiting for a picture...nothing yet. surpise surprise.

Keermalec
04-02-2000, 03:15 AM
Why would anyone lie for a thing like that?

He's either mislead or he's telling some form of truth...

Skywalker and Jokostel: you can't shut down a thread just because you don't believe it. That would be going against the very reasons that made this bbs exist!

[This message has been edited by Keermalec (edited 04-02-2000).]

jokostel
04-02-2000, 08:01 AM
Hey Kerrmalec:>> Do you see a picture from him by now?!?!? no.
he is just a little person who tries to impress everyone by "acting" like he has got a chip to 2x speed via what kinda of cooling,& settings?! Or proof of it for that matter.
Id rather just have this tread closed and save bandwith for people who will use it graceously....
adios
jokostel

jokostel
04-02-2000, 06:40 PM
SocalGal or Scott Please Close This Useless Thread Thank You......
jokostel

Missing the point
04-02-2000, 06:56 PM
Actually, I kinda want to see what he says sooner or later....... This is quite the B*tch-fest going on here, and its kinda fun........

RobRich
04-02-2000, 07:57 PM
Let me completely disect why his cpu will never see 798:

The k6-2 core is based on a rather poorly designed .25 micron fabrication process. It is amazing that the AFR/AFX revisions are making the 550-575mhz level, considering that the true k6 core has changed little since the introduction of the first k6 series. The main obstacle when dealing with overclocking the k6 core is heat. At 798 degrees, his cpu would require HUGE amounts of electricity (my estimate would yield 4.0+ volts). Even assuming that the core could handle this, which NO .25m cpu can, then he would have to dissipate more heat than even an actively cooled peltier setup could handle. The only alternatives would be compressed liquid cooling using a liquidified gas. I am really sure that he has a liquid nitrogen storage system at his house. I don't believe that is something that you can pick up at your local computer shop.

Now let's assume you could actually cool it, and that the core could sustain the voltage. Then the level one cache onboard the k6-2 has a "implied" funtioning limit of 600mhz due to its architecture. OK, so he could argue that the l1 cache is disabled. If so, then he will barely have enough processing power to run a cpu benchmark, less long use it for anything productive.

I am also glad to see he has the extensive electronic knowledge needed to rewire the k6 core. I know of no k6 hardware hacks that have proved to be successful. I have studied the k6 core documents to some degree, and I have seen no way that one could alter the core to change it's o/c ability.

If you can't tell, I'm being rather sarcastic. The biggest reason why he can sustain this is the FSB and mutliplier. If he uses the 2x --> 6x remap, then his front side bus would equal 133mhz. I admit that super7 motherboards exist that utilize the 133 FSB, but I have never seeen one actually work (and I deal with many super7 systems). The highest susatined FSB I've ever seen correctly function is 112mhz. That would yield 672mhz, a far cry from 798. I have seen a few attempts with the 124mhz setting, but the system in question was completely unstable, and definitely not usable. We could barely run one DOS benchmark, then the system would do a hard crash. We almost toasted the k6-2 450 cpu in the process.

Hot cpu, considering I doubt you have cyrogenic freezing, a cpu capable of 4.0+ volts, a s7 motherboard with stable 133 FSB support, and the technical knowledge to rewire a cpu, I will dismiss this garbage post as another lame attempt of somone trying to gain popularity. You could have came up with a better, and more beleiveable lie. I seriously hope this post gets locked, and your account banned. I will now no longer dignify this post with my presence, and I hope that the Sysopt members will take suit. If you can applogize for this completely absurb post, then I might regard you as a member. Otherwise, your future posts will be regarded as trash, I have no use for trash. The forums provide us member with a place to discuss technology, help others, and hopefully learn something. Take a cue from the last part, learn that you don't post idiotic statements that are nothing but flame bait.

I don't commonly respond in a hateful manner to any post, but this idiot has upset me, as I feel this garbage is better served on forums other that Sysopt.com . We strive to have the best forum on the net, and I hope that continues. I do not want a proliferation of these idiots that have nothing better to do than post complete garbage. I feel that posts on valid topics are perfectly fine. I will glady try to answer questions, discuss current technology, and even joke around. But I have no respect for anyone that attempts to post trash like this.

I applogize to anyone that I may have offended (other than hot cpu),

Robert Richmond

[This message has been edited by RobRich (edited 04-02-2000).]

Missing the point
04-02-2000, 08:25 PM
you go girl http://www.sysopt.com/forum/wink.gif

socalgal
04-02-2000, 08:46 PM
And I think with that, we'll bid this thread a (not so) fond adieu......