WINTUNE RESULTS...ANY GOOD FOR MY K6-2 300

[chad174]

i have my k6-2 o/ced to 366 and here are my wintune results...i havent changed them any, trust me...ok here they are...but are they good comparably to like p2s or other k6-2s???and this is only with 32 megs of ram.

INPUT NAME=location TYPE=HIDDEN VALUE="C:\WINDOWS\desktop\wt98.html">
<table border=0><tr><td CLASS=attr>CPU<td CLASS=data> (1) AMD K6-2 with MultiMedia Extensions@367 MHz </td>
<tr><td CLASS=attr>Video Board<td CLASS=data>Diamond Viper V550 for Windows 95
<tr><td CLASS=attr>Video Mode<td CLASS=data>800x600@16bits/pixel
<tr><td CLASS=attr>RAM<td CLASS=data>32 MB
<tr><td CLASS=attr>OS<td CLASS=data>Windows 95 4.0.1212 b
</table><br><table border=0><tr><th>Area Tested<th>Value
<tr><td CLASS=attr>CPU Integer<td CLASS=data>727.3267 MIPS
<tr><td CLASS=attr>CPU Floating Point<td CLASS=data>440.787 MFLOPS
<tr><td CLASS=attr>Video(2D)<td CLASS=data>47.38579 MPixels/s
<tr><td CLASS=attr>Direct3D<td CLASS=data>100.7665 MPixels/s
<tr><td CLASS=attr>OpenGL<td CLASS=data>75.81503 MPixels/s
<tr><td CLASS=attr>Memory<td CLASS=data>540.6389 MB/s
<tr><td CLASS=attr>Cached Disk<td CLASS=data>38.57082 MB/s

[ThiDK1]

Hey CHAD, yes those are good numbers. Same as my K62-366 non-overclocked. Lookin good, I however just overclocked my Cel 366A to 458, almost doubles the MIPS/MFLOPS rate.

Happy computing

[Kevohboy]

CPU
AMD K6-2 with MultiMedia Extensions @ 335 MHz
Video Board
3Dfx Voodoo Banshee AGP SGRAM for Windows 98
Video Mode
800x600@16bits/pixel
RAM 64 MB
OS Windows 98 4.10.1998


Area Tested
Value
CPU Integer
858.1703 MIPS

CPU Floating Point
397.5375 MFLOPS

Video(2D)
82.14754 MPixels/s

Direct3D
169.9394 MPixels/s

OpenGL
8.009022 MPixels/s

Memory
557.6035 MB/s

Cached Disk
70.0069 MB/s

Uncached Disk
1.647976 MB/s

[tpetre]

heres a k63 400 o/c to 450WinTune 98
Offline Test Results
CPU (1) AMD 9@451 MHz
Video Board NVidia RIVA TNT
Video Mode 800x600@16bits/pixel
RAM 64 MB
OS Windows 98 4.10.1998

Area Tested Value
CPU Integer 1226.689 MIPS
CPU Floating Point 542.7986 MFLOPS
Video(2D) 41.47353 MPixels/s
Direct3D 164.4316 MPixels/s
OpenGL 112.4484 MPixels/s
Memory 949.4661 MB/s
Cached Disk 115.8962 MB/s
Uncached Disk 3.276489 MB/s





Press the Upload button to submit the current result set to the Web server.

[Ed_S]

Chad, looks like something not quite right. Your numbers should be better than Kevohboy's, not worse. Doesn't look much better than my p285, worse in some areas.

P233 @ 3 X 95, 2.9v Soyo 5EHM

CPU (1) Intel Pentium P55C with MMX@285 MHz
Video Board STB Velocity 128
Video Mode 1024x768@16bits/pixel
RAM 64 MB
OS Windows 95 4.0.1111 B


Area Tested Value
CPU Integer 709.171 MIPS
CPU Floating Point 330.2281 MFLOPS
Video(2D) 54.31705 MPixels/s
Direct3D 83.24579 MPixels/s
OpenGL 46.87874 MPixels/s
Memory 245.9573 MB/s
Cached Disk 44.06446 MB/s
Uncached Disk 9.669527 MB/s

[jokostel]

here are my benchmarks till this fall when ill get a k6-3 for the MB...hehe(VA503+)
AMD K6 with MultiMedia Extensions
(1) 334 MHz
Windows 98 4.10.1998
3Dfx Voodoo Banshee AGP for Windows 98
1024x768@16bits/pixel
824 MIPS (Integer operations)
390 MFLOPS (Floating point operations)
72 (Integer application simulation)
41 (Floating point application simulation)
61 (MMX application simulation)
66 Video MPixels/s
6.6 OpenGL MPixels/s (i have a VOODOO BANSHEE so..)
96 Direct3D MPixels/s
542 RAM MB/s
64 cached disk MB/s
1.9 uncached disk MB/s

*** I WAS RUNNING ABOUT 3 instances of IE5.01 while i did this so.....)hehe


[This message has been edited by jokostel (edited 04-17-99).]