shmelev
02-19-2001, 12:46 AM
Here is my problem: my Dimension XPS 233 has a (I am pretty sure) LX MB and Ultra ATA 6 G Maxtor ATA-4 hard drive that is sitting on the master end of the controller cable and it's jumper is set by the Dell as "cable select". When I tried to install a new IBM's Deskstar 60 G Ultra ATA 100 HD it didn't get noticed by the BIOS! No matter how I set it: "master", or "slave"(while having the Maxtor as a master), or "cable select" (my PC manual recommends "cable select") and I have hooked it with, or without, or in place of the Maxtor (when Descstars' jumpers set for a "master") - no luck!. I understand the ATA 100 has to be backwards compatible with ATA 33. But the question is: "IS ATA-4 THE SAME AS ATA 33?"
Was I right when assumed that ATA-4 (my Maxtor) and ATA 33 (to which Descstar suppose to be backwards compatible) are the same?
Is there a possibility of a BIOS bug?
If so, is there a new revision of a BIOS for my MB out there?
I currently have Phoenix Bios 4.0 Release 6.0 (Dell's version A09).
Do I positively need either ATA 66 or ATA 100 controller card to get it tested? (If it is only going to work with the ATA 66 or ATA 100 I'd rather get a newest MB with a controller built-in).
How probable is that the new IBM HD itself is defective? I do not have another newer PC with ATA 33, ATA 66, or ATA 100 controller sitting around in my studio apartment to try and see if the HD is going to be recognized by BIOS there.
Your prompt response will be greatly appreciated!
I have less than two weeks left to return the drive if it is defective!
Sergey.
Was I right when assumed that ATA-4 (my Maxtor) and ATA 33 (to which Descstar suppose to be backwards compatible) are the same?
Is there a possibility of a BIOS bug?
If so, is there a new revision of a BIOS for my MB out there?
I currently have Phoenix Bios 4.0 Release 6.0 (Dell's version A09).
Do I positively need either ATA 66 or ATA 100 controller card to get it tested? (If it is only going to work with the ATA 66 or ATA 100 I'd rather get a newest MB with a controller built-in).
How probable is that the new IBM HD itself is defective? I do not have another newer PC with ATA 33, ATA 66, or ATA 100 controller sitting around in my studio apartment to try and see if the HD is going to be recognized by BIOS there.
Your prompt response will be greatly appreciated!
I have less than two weeks left to return the drive if it is defective!
Sergey.