aoshishinomori
08-13-2007, 11:34 PM
whitch would be beter for me to run in raid sata or sata 2 or the WD raptor and why?
| //flex table opened by JP
Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : sata VS. sata2 aoshishinomori 08-13-2007, 11:34 PM whitch would be beter for me to run in raid sata or sata 2 or the WD raptor and why? Midknyte 08-13-2007, 11:53 PM you didn't say what kind of RAID. most people are just fine with a raptor. it's easier to set up, manage, and recover from a disaster. aoshishinomori 08-13-2007, 11:54 PM on raid 0 for speed aoshishinomori 08-13-2007, 11:56 PM i ment wich would be faster 2 raptors (sata) runnig on raid0 or 2 sata2 HD running on raid 0? Midknyte 08-14-2007, 01:18 AM raptors are the fastest SATA drives, so of course a RAID0 array with raptors would be the fastest. SATA2 doesn't come into play there. interface is one of the least determining factors of performance. http://www.storagereview.com/php/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=PerformanceFactors aoshishinomori 08-14-2007, 01:30 AM ty 4 the help G 08-18-2007, 09:39 AM RAID is not really necessary on a desktop machine. SysOpt.com
Copyright Internet.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |