//flex table opened by JP

Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Windows x64 observations


BipolarBill
05-13-2005, 07:20 PM
Here is what I've experienced:

1. Installs just like the 32-bit version.

2. Does *not* include a large database of 64-bit drivers for legacy hardware. For instance, I can't find drivers for a GeForce2 Pro. Standard VGA drivers stink! The latest nVidia Beta x64 drivers only include the latest 66x and 68x cards.

3. Although 32-bit apps work in a "virtual space", any app that includes drivers or services (AV programs come to mind) must be made for the 64-bit platform. Currently, Avast is the only free AV program that works.

4. There is a 64-bit version of IE included as an option. AFAIK, there are no plugins for this version. Still, the included 32-bit version works fine.

All in all, I like x64, but it's not ready for primetime unless you're running the very latest hardware and you're willing to cough up for updated system utilities.

Sterling_Aug
05-13-2005, 08:10 PM
I have been running XP64 since the Customer preview program and I ordered my upgrade disk 2 weeks ago (still waiting for the order to ship).

I found all of the drivers I needed except a decent video driver for my onboard ATI RageXL video card.

Who in their right mind runs IE in 32 bit or 64 bit? Why aren't you running Mozilla Firefox and be free of popups and many of the viruses out in the wild?

The bottom line is this: It is much easier to install and use than a 64 bit version of any Linux distro. 16 minutes from start to finsh for a repair install. I love it.

BipolarBill
05-13-2005, 08:54 PM
I'm just stating the facts. I still use IE anyway.

I didn't activate it and I don't plan to until I can get legacy drivers for my TV card, video card, scanners and printers. I'm just testing it.

Although I ordered the update, Technet sent me a full version this month. If anyone wants my update CD, I'm all ears!