I need a new gaming Motherboard

[Itchy_c]

Well my ASUS motherboard went out, and I need a new one. I decided to use the opportunity to upgrade. I already have everything else I need including a 512 of DDR400 (except CPU w/ fan). I'm gonna get a Athlon 64 3200+ CPU. I figured it is a good bang for the buck. Here are the boards I'm looking at:

1. SOYO CK8 Dragon Plus
2. ASUS K8V Deluxe
3. Chaintech ZNF3-150 (Little too spendy though)

I'm using an ATI Radeon 98000 PRO. Should I worry about the ATI video card with a nVIDIA nForce 3 mobo mith?

[Direct1]

I'm using an ATI Radeon 98000 PRO. Should I worry about the ATI video card with a nVIDIA nForce 3 mobo mith?
No, just be sure to do a Clean Install of Windows XP (http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/cleanxpinstall.html) (just guessing you have XP). It's the best way. :)

This is a good choice for an nForce3 MB...

GIGABYTE nForce3 150 Chipset Motherboard for AMD Socket 754 CPU, Model "GA-K8N PRO" -RETAIL (http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=13-128-200&depa=0) = $116 USD shipped.

Good luck! :D

[Itchy_c]

So Gigabyte is a better brand than SOYO huh? Well let me do some research on it. Thanks for the input.

[Direct1]

Never said that, just a preference. This is a good MB if you want to save some money...

GIGABYTE K8T800 Chipset Motherboard for AMD Socket 754 CPU, Model "GA-K8VT800" -RETAIL (http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=13-128-226&depa=0) = $93 USD shipped.

Good luck! :D

[zubaosuop]

i would also go with gigabyte, espically if your looking to OC

[Bat25]

This is the board Im about to order. Foxconn SIS 755. I will be using an A64 3400+


http://www.foxconnchannel.com/image/MB/755A01-6EKRS-B.jpg

[causticVapor]

Good man. Going after the chipset that has full-speed HT and AGP/PCI locks. ;) :D

[Yoshi]

http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=13-152-043&depa=1

NV3 250 is out:t

[Bat25]

Originally posted by causticVapor
Good man. Going after the chipset that has full-speed HT and AGP/PCI locks. ;) :D

Anad reported agp-pci lock on the board, another didn't. Actually I dont care. 220-233 is enough for me. I don't need a pure OC board at all, just a nice and stable board and one that is very fast in stock trim. However - I may get an 875P board anyway. I'll think about it this week. Nforce3 250 might be a consideration too, but I would wait for a few more board to come out. The SIS 755 looks like a good option, and .. I like not having what everyone else has sometimes. SIS did well with the 755.

[Itchy_c]

Wow, I didn't know this thread was still active. Anyway, I've been reciently been having problems with my AMD system, so I think I'm gonna swap boards with an all Intel system.

[causticVapor]

Hehe, AMD, those guys don't know how make functional computer hardware. :p

Intel's space heater WWF-heatsink chips are way, way better. :rolleyes:

[Bat25]

Intel has a two fold advantage - far (but a huge margin) better chipset drivers, and cooler running processors. However, that gap will soon close dramatically withing the next two years imo. I can happen just as ATI totally demolished nVIDA in the graphics arena where nVIDA had become complacent by diversification (nforce motherboards), and by bad management. Also, amd still offers tremendous value for a cost conscious consumer that understands hardware. The only people that truly have problems with amd are people who are not well versed in how to deal with petential amd (chipset) driver issues and the issues that hat can cause with other components. I myself have nothing I cant quickly deal with concerning AMD. So while I understand Intels dominance and quality, I also undertand AMD's bargain and how to deal with tech issues that can once in a while crop up. I like Both Intel, and AMD for what they both offer.

[causticVapor]

Intel has a two fold advantage - far (but a huge margin) better chipset drivers, and cooler running processors.

Maybe true two years ago, certainly not now.

[Itchy_c]

I'm getting an all Intel system for the stability for my computer. It is too much of a pain to have to troubleshoot my system everytime I have a problem, and to have to pay a tech to do it when I can't find the problem. I never have problems like these whenever I have an Intel setup.

It is too bad too, because I wanted to get a newer AMD system for gaming performance, and to put a cool Evil Inside sticker on the front instead of an Intel Inside.

Back on the subject, here's the board I want now: Intel - D875PBZLK

[lptech]

Itchy_c-

I think that Intel would be a good choice if you are going to be doing lots of video editing with your machine. As far as gaming is concerned AMD's processors are quite good and actually before for gaming IMHO than Intel's. People who've complained about AMD CPUs really didn't follow any of the recommendations at the AMD website regarding how-to correctly configure their systems using AMD's CPUs. That said, it is no wonder they have problems with their systems! I've built both AMD-based systems and Intel-based systems and both types have worked well for me without fail. As long as you follow the CPU manufacturer's recommendations, you should not have any problems at all.

So which ever way you decide to go should be fine, just as long as you follow what the CPU manufacturer recommends and that you also use a very good PSU (Power Supply Unit). Good luck!

LPTECH

[causticVapor]

I have built both too, and have worked them to death without issue. Blaming one or another company would be foolhardy- realize that if they couldn't release stable chips they'd long be six feet under.:rolleyes:

[Bat25]

I build with both too. At least 3 rigs a month if not more. Sometimes 6-7. VIA an nVIDA chipsets are stright up more problematic than intel. Nothing I can't deal with though. But your average user pulls hair out at times.

[crapyking]

built several computers using there mobo's. def my fav - very stable. don't take a chance on a low budget off brand -YOU WILL BE SORRY!:t

[RamonGTP]

Originally posted by Bat25
Intel has a two fold advantage - far (but a huge margin) better chipset drivers, and cooler running processors. However, that gap will soon close dramatically withing the next two years imo.

That gap has closed already, no need to wait two years. Intel has had the hottest running processor since they introduced the 3.2C.... Then they beat their own record with the "E" (Prescott) core. I haven't had issues with chipset drivers from nVidia, VIA, or Intel.