Bluehail
03-11-2004, 06:29 PM
The Pr0nstar 7K400 sounds like a more applicable name
| //flex table opened by JP
Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Hitachi Teases With 400GB HDD Bluehail 03-11-2004, 06:29 PM The Pr0nstar 7K400 sounds like a more applicable name Shockedder 03-11-2004, 07:08 PM When is the little 1Tb baby coming ? I'm up for that. :D On another note , bigger is better , NO ? :p bob05 03-11-2004, 07:22 PM RAID array anyone? ;) neverwhere 03-11-2004, 09:48 PM RAID array? Overkill much? :p _Mystical_Night 03-11-2004, 11:16 PM *drool* too bad its probly going to be really really expensive ... possibly as much as the WD raptor drives sm8000 03-12-2004, 02:00 AM Anybody know the storage limit with 48-bit LBA? My math ain't up to snuff. Terminator 03-12-2004, 04:45 AM 48 bit limit will be 2^48 = 281474976710656 bits Converting to Terabytes will be 281474976710656/(8*1024*1024*1024*1024) = 32TB Of course some manufacturers use 1000 rather than 1024 to convert which is why when you format say a 120GB drive it shows up as less than 120GB..usually it'll show up as slightly over 114GB. Using the same maths a manufacturers quoted 500GB drive will show up as approx 477GB! T :t crimsonoa 03-12-2004, 11:54 AM You loose space when formating too. Cyan 03-12-2004, 12:22 PM Originally posted by crimsonoa You loose space when formating too. about 8megs with XP I think. causticVapor 03-12-2004, 06:22 PM Originally posted by _Mystical_Night *drool* too bad its probly going to be really really expensive ... possibly as much as the WD raptor drives :eek: as much... probably about twice as much... look at the price of the 300GB maxtor :eek: richard_cocks 03-14-2004, 01:09 PM Originally posted by Terminator 48 bit limit will be 2^48 = 281474976710656 bits Converting to Terabytes will be 281474976710656/(8*1024*1024*1024*1024) = 32TB Of course some manufacturers use 1000 rather than 1024 to convert which is why when you format say a 120GB drive it shows up as less than 120GB..usually it'll show up as slightly over 114GB. Using the same maths a manufacturers quoted 500GB drive will show up as approx 477GB! :t 465GB by my maths :p Terminator 03-14-2004, 03:52 PM Obviously I didn't mention when manufacturers started using x1000 for advertising their hard drive capacities. Not going to get involved in a maths debate but the brief history is :- 8 bits to the byte 1024 bytes = 1 kilobyte 1024 kb = 1 Megabyte (here some,not all, manufacturers used 1000) 1024MB = 1 Gigabyte (most if not all manufacters used 1000) 1024GB = 1 Terabyte. Using this a TRUE 500GB drive would be 500*8*1024*1024*1024 bits Using manufacturers guide 500Gb = 500*8*1024*1000*1000 bits. = 4096000000000bits. Using true conversion back to GB =(4096000000000/(8*1024*1024*1024) = 476.8GB ~ 477GB Using this same conversion gives me EXACTLY the capacity my Seagate 120GB drive shows up as. I understand where you got 465Gb , probably my fault for not pointing out that they all use 1024 to calculate the number of bytes. T :t richard_cocks 03-14-2004, 04:40 PM so they use 1024B for a KB? why do they do that then use 1000KB for a MB? Terminator 03-14-2004, 05:54 PM Good question. Only answer is they can advertise higher capacity drives than they actually are. My 120GB drive formats as 114GB...6GB 'lost'. I first noticed this disparagies when drives moved above 20GB. In the days when I first built computers the drive capacities were 20-40 MB drives and they formatted exactly as stated. When they hit 20GB they still formatted as exactly 20GB but once I had drives over 40GB I noticed this 'lose' in capacity and tried to work out where it had gone and stumbled on an article which explained it. I just put it down to marketing. If you have a drive over 40GB try the equation and I bet you it comes extremely close to the formatted capacity. To save the maths :- 60GB ---> 55.879GB 80GB ---> 76.294GB 100GB --> 95.367GB 120GB --> 114.441GB 140GB --> 133.514GB 160GB --> 152.588GB ' ' ' 400GB --> 381.490GB T :t gjimene2 03-14-2004, 06:15 PM It sucks that most manufacturors label their systems in the "unformated capacity" The 400GB drive would be good to also use in digital surveillance systems. _Mystical_Night 03-14-2004, 07:15 PM you forgot 250 gigs :p I hope this brings down the value of current hard drives even more :p i want like x8 hard drives :x :x SysOpt.com
Copyright Internet.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |