//flex table opened by JP

Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : 3DM01SE - 17432 | 3DM03 - 5455 ... Can I get better?


MtX
10-08-2003, 07:44 PM
Here are my system specs:

ABIT NF7-S Rev 2.0 Bios 18
Athlon XP 1700+ DL3TCJIUHB0310 @ 200*11.5 ~ 2.3 GHz
Thermalright SLK-800A w/ Delta 68.5 CFM
2x256 Corsair 256 PC3200 PT Rev 1.2 @ Dual Channel
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro @ 350*330
Western Digital 80GB 8MB Cache
Lite-On 52x32x52
Antec SLK-3700AMB 350W PSU w/ 120mm Delta 130 CFM + Antec default
Windows 2000 Professional SP4

Currently, Im getting 3D Mark 2001 SE @ 17432 and 3D Mark 2003 @ 5455.. That's pretty much average and not bad, but I want more :) .. I was doing the project compare with Futuremark's ORB website and I was surprised.. Lots of people had the same hardware spec as me, yet their scores were 1000-1500 higher.. That's quite a lot of marks for having the same specs.. I dont know how and what they did to achieve that, but Im hoping to get 20000+ myself too... Can anyone help?

Magua
10-08-2003, 07:53 PM
That sounds about right.

My Rig:

Athlon 2500+
9800pro 128mb
Asus A7N8X Deluxe mobo
1gb crucial pc3200
WD 120gb 7200rpm
XP Pro SP1

I never bothered Downloading 2001, but in 2003 I score 5631, but havent done any OCing.

MtX
10-08-2003, 08:00 PM
bah, your video card owns me... i wish i can get at 20000+ in 3dm01SE and 6000+ in 3dm03 :)

does anyone know why when I OC my vid card and i reboot, the clocks are set back @ default? THANKS!

bblqj78
10-09-2003, 07:11 AM
you gotta save ur settings....well using Rivatuner anyway!

:t

MtX
10-09-2003, 07:28 AM
lol :D

i managed to get 17865 and 5764... not very big improvement but still something.. how can i get 20k and 6k!??!

Magua
10-09-2003, 12:21 PM
Thats more then 300 3dMark2003 points...thats a pretty good jump. What did you change?

MtX
10-09-2003, 04:04 PM
i jus took out some services....

cwin
10-10-2003, 02:59 AM
I think you have a very good score!

MtX
10-10-2003, 07:26 AM
now i went down cause i was using the new 3.8 drivers.. bah this sucks!

Bigjakkstaffa
10-12-2003, 01:00 PM
3.7 and 3.8 performance is identical more or less, simply with typical random score fluctuations. All i woudl advise you to do now is visit soem good tweak sites and start overclocking

http://www.sysopt.com/articles/VCOGuide/index.html

--Jakk:t

Magua
10-12-2003, 03:13 PM
I think the performance with 3.8's are almost identical to the 3.7's, probably just variation with the tests.

MtX
10-12-2003, 03:14 PM
i got like 17300 with cat 3.8 omega.. so i just went back to default ati 3.8s and i got 17800!

cwin
10-12-2003, 03:15 PM
Originally posted by MtX
i got like 17300 with cat 3.8 omega.. so i just went back to default ati 3.8s and i got 17800! Woo Wooo! :D