Bigjakkstaffa
10-01-2003, 03:57 PM
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,60654,00.html
--Jakk:t
--Jakk:t
| //flex table opened by JP
Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : It is actually working for the RIAA... Bigjakkstaffa 10-01-2003, 03:57 PM http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,60654,00.html --Jakk:t neverwhere 10-01-2003, 04:04 PM not for me... im still dloading like crazy... @#$^ the RIAA! mireland 10-01-2003, 10:20 PM Originally posted by neverwhere not for me... im still dloading like crazy... @#$^ the RIAA! http://www.fancysplace.com/smileys/protest.gif cwin 10-02-2003, 03:07 AM id say what i think, and do... but it prolly brakes several laws ;) :p MiKe85 10-04-2003, 05:13 PM What will their explanation be when record sales continue to slide? The last couple of weeks have had some good albums hit the market, but I am still not convinced. It's scary how quickly some people are willing to fork over money. The RIAA took 12 settlements from people that haven't even been sued yet? This worries me a bit.... zybch 10-04-2003, 06:41 PM I can't believe that the RIAA's efforts are actually working. Most probably there is just a cyclic thing going on that they have twisted a bit and released as gospel figures, in much the same way that you can influence survey results by careful wording of the questions. Here in Australia, a few years back our beloved government decided to remove import restrictions on audio CDs. In theory this was supposed to lower prices. In the end prices went up and local artists received fewer royalty payments. I used to buy CDs, but I generally download music/programs now. After all, if the artists are getting squat anyway, why should I continue to make the big recoding labels rich? SysOpt.com
Copyright Internet.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |