Richard_Cranium72
07-18-2001, 06:08 PM
I read more reviews and user opinions on Computer products than the average street person.
On a particular item, the Canon S600 Printer, I'm confused, to say the least.
CNet Gives it an "Editors Choice" as the No.1 printer-> http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-2375165-418-5529028.html?pn=1&lb=2&ob=0&tag=st.co.2375165.top.5529028-1
Yet 22% of "User Reviews" are disgusted with the product, what gives ?
Bad batch, spotty quality, whining owners, poor review, I don't know.
User Comments->>
"I found the quality of this mediocre at best. The plain text output quality is terrible on both plain paper and high resolution paper, contrary to what the review said"
http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gifMy Favorite Comment->>
"Anyone who throws money away on a Canon printer should not be allowed to own a computer. The rival products put forth by HP and Epson are so far superior that I'm surprised that Canon even still gets shelf space at retailers."
"I have owned 2 Canon inkjet printers now---After a not too long time, both printers stopped feeding paper properly. It works sometimes, but I am often up having to re-adjust the paper stack or hand feed the sheets one at a time.I will never buy another Canon again"
"The reliability is the same as that of past canons because I am at 3 weeks and 12 cartridges and having a failed printer that keeps jamming. Canon is jabbing me on tech support saying that I pushed the printer too hard. I kinda told them why make it fast if it can't handle it."
"grainy photos and soft graphics"
Got s600 4 days ago.Used glossy photo paper but not Canon Pro and got easily visible dots. On greeting card stock I got soft graphics and text--looks cheesy. Got NO satisfaction from tech support. Am returning it tomorrow to try HP 952"
"I bought this printer, based on CNET reviews. The quality of the photo prints is LOUSY!! I printed the same pictures on my HP932C, using the same computer. There was a BIG difference; HP was much sharper and better quality all around! I am taking this one back to the store, TODAY"
"The Cnet review is wrong. I am taking mine back tommorrow."
"Very poor print quality"
"It is miserable"
Terrible printer with terrible ink quality."
"Dissapointing"
"there is no way this is a "photo quality printer". I tried myself and with the help of cannon tech. support to get photo quality results, no luck. It just cannot do it!!! ---I returned my cannon unit after a week and bought the HP 952C. The picture quality is UNREAL!!!! It is slower but I can wait a few second more (about 30% longer)for quality. It actually cost ten dollars less. I wanted to write this because I looked at the previous reviews and they influenced me into getting the cannon S600. I'm not sure what they were writing about? Comparing photos printed out on my HP 952C to the ones I still have from my Canon, it is a joke. "
On a particular item, the Canon S600 Printer, I'm confused, to say the least.
CNet Gives it an "Editors Choice" as the No.1 printer-> http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-2375165-418-5529028.html?pn=1&lb=2&ob=0&tag=st.co.2375165.top.5529028-1
Yet 22% of "User Reviews" are disgusted with the product, what gives ?
Bad batch, spotty quality, whining owners, poor review, I don't know.
User Comments->>
"I found the quality of this mediocre at best. The plain text output quality is terrible on both plain paper and high resolution paper, contrary to what the review said"
http://www.sysopt.com/forum/smile.gifMy Favorite Comment->>
"Anyone who throws money away on a Canon printer should not be allowed to own a computer. The rival products put forth by HP and Epson are so far superior that I'm surprised that Canon even still gets shelf space at retailers."
"I have owned 2 Canon inkjet printers now---After a not too long time, both printers stopped feeding paper properly. It works sometimes, but I am often up having to re-adjust the paper stack or hand feed the sheets one at a time.I will never buy another Canon again"
"The reliability is the same as that of past canons because I am at 3 weeks and 12 cartridges and having a failed printer that keeps jamming. Canon is jabbing me on tech support saying that I pushed the printer too hard. I kinda told them why make it fast if it can't handle it."
"grainy photos and soft graphics"
Got s600 4 days ago.Used glossy photo paper but not Canon Pro and got easily visible dots. On greeting card stock I got soft graphics and text--looks cheesy. Got NO satisfaction from tech support. Am returning it tomorrow to try HP 952"
"I bought this printer, based on CNET reviews. The quality of the photo prints is LOUSY!! I printed the same pictures on my HP932C, using the same computer. There was a BIG difference; HP was much sharper and better quality all around! I am taking this one back to the store, TODAY"
"The Cnet review is wrong. I am taking mine back tommorrow."
"Very poor print quality"
"It is miserable"
Terrible printer with terrible ink quality."
"Dissapointing"
"there is no way this is a "photo quality printer". I tried myself and with the help of cannon tech. support to get photo quality results, no luck. It just cannot do it!!! ---I returned my cannon unit after a week and bought the HP 952C. The picture quality is UNREAL!!!! It is slower but I can wait a few second more (about 30% longer)for quality. It actually cost ten dollars less. I wanted to write this because I looked at the previous reviews and they influenced me into getting the cannon S600. I'm not sure what they were writing about? Comparing photos printed out on my HP 952C to the ones I still have from my Canon, it is a joke. "