ak3883
06-04-2003, 04:59 PM
I think I am going to go with a Radeon 9500 PRO over a TI4800SE
See if my reasoning makes sense:
Heres why:
-performance might be behind even a TI4200 a bit, when you are running w/o visual goodies(aka 4XAA, etc.), but at 130, 150fps, is that really that noticable? I mean, 150fps to 130fps isn't that big a difference to the eye.
-As soon as you crank on the 4XAA and whatever else the ATI optimizes for, it leaves even the TI4600 in the dust. 55fps at 1280X1024 w/ 4XAA and stuff is MUCH better than 28fps or so.
These are the numbers where every 5or10fps is important.
-9500's are DX9, ready for the future, while TI's are only DX8.1
It looks like they have finally gotten the driver issues straightened out... or at least a lot better.
I'm hearing I should get a 9500PRO over a 9600PRO, is this true? Why would the older one be faster?
Any diehard nvidia fans convince me otherwise?
See if my reasoning makes sense:
Heres why:
-performance might be behind even a TI4200 a bit, when you are running w/o visual goodies(aka 4XAA, etc.), but at 130, 150fps, is that really that noticable? I mean, 150fps to 130fps isn't that big a difference to the eye.
-As soon as you crank on the 4XAA and whatever else the ATI optimizes for, it leaves even the TI4600 in the dust. 55fps at 1280X1024 w/ 4XAA and stuff is MUCH better than 28fps or so.
These are the numbers where every 5or10fps is important.
-9500's are DX9, ready for the future, while TI's are only DX8.1
It looks like they have finally gotten the driver issues straightened out... or at least a lot better.
I'm hearing I should get a 9500PRO over a 9600PRO, is this true? Why would the older one be faster?
Any diehard nvidia fans convince me otherwise?