civic91dx
12-22-2002, 02:05 PM
it bench 1120 with my asylum geforce 4 ti4200 is that good? i dont know much about bench markin
| //flex table opened by JP
Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : ti4200 civic91dx 12-22-2002, 02:05 PM it bench 1120 with my asylum geforce 4 ti4200 is that good? i dont know much about bench markin Bigjakkstaffa 12-22-2002, 02:58 PM 1120 for a ti4200 is not good 11200 isnt bad - but really we need more details about the rest of the system before we can judge. Gfx benches also depend on your CPU and RAM y'know --Jakk:t Optimus Prime 12-22-2002, 03:13 PM yeah, a 486 66mhz aint gonna be good even with a geforce 4 ;). causticVapor 12-22-2002, 03:54 PM Not that you could Optimus, but, ... To be getting a score of 1120, I assume he either has 1) a sub-600MHz CPU, or, 2) all the details way high, with anisotropic filtering and AA maxed out, and at a high res, OR, 3) something royally FUBAR. Bigjakkstaffa 12-22-2002, 06:20 PM 1) a sub-600MHz CPU, or, Your way off course there, with a 1.4ghz tbird and gf4ti4200 i only scrape 9000 --Jakk:t $1500-P4 gamer 12-22-2002, 07:00 PM Originally posted by Bigjakkstaffa Your way off course there, with a 1.4ghz tbird and gf4ti4200 i only scrape 9000 --Jakk:t WoW! Im getting that almost with a 8500Le 256mb rdram and 1.5gig P4. Hehe. When the XP 2100+ and nforce2 512mb pc2700 arrives I suspect about 10,000.:D civic91dx 12-22-2002, 10:55 PM no i bench at 11220. srry. my sys conclude of: 2700+ XP Cpu Asus a7v8x 512mb Pc3200 geforce 4 ti4200 24x cd burner Windows xp Pro SP1 and im using mad onio software. my sys is curently down trying to figure out what. i think i just fried the cpu. ConfusedAlien 12-23-2002, 12:30 AM i think i speak for everyone when i say "oh" GrowingSlowly 12-23-2002, 09:10 PM Lot of Ti 4200s here. Let me ask. Does anyone have the one with 64mb DDR? How does that compare with the 128 SDRam? Bigjakkstaffa 12-24-2002, 07:04 AM I got the 64 mb - its clocked faster and thus runs and o/c's faster than the 128 mb card. This is fine for most games and 3d mark as it will beat the 128mb card. However in games with large texture sizes, such as the forthcoming doom 3, the 128 mb will be faster due to there being more textures than RAM on the gfx card --Jakk:t Jawa 12-24-2002, 11:17 AM I agree that the 64MB is slightly faster. I got the 128MB, thinking for in the future like Jakk said.. the newer stuff will need more memory for the textures. Also, I like holding the title of having 128MB of vid memory. :p Benssax 12-24-2002, 11:36 AM I don't know if there faster. I have a 128mb and I'm getting 8376 with a P3 1ghz @ 1.13ghz. :t Benssax 12-24-2002, 11:37 AM All I can tell you if your ram is not at 2-2-2 its slowing it way down. expcially with really fast systems. Bigjakkstaffa 12-24-2002, 01:50 PM The 64mb IS faster as its cloked at higher speeds than thwe 128, the only case in which this is wrong is when the 64mb Vram fills and system RAM begins to be used --Jakk:t cyber2wise 12-27-2002, 10:58 PM I think your system should do better . My system 3Dbench mark , with 3Dmarks 2001 SE is 11894 , I hope to break 12000 soon. My spec are GA-7VAX mother Bd with the via kt 400 chipset GeForce4 Ti4200xp Albatron 128 meg core at 305 memory at stock setting 552 XP1700 @ XP200 512meg of Crucial pc2100 Ram cd/sound card/ two Hard drives shoot for over 12000 I think you will make it, other have with 2700+ civic91dx 12-28-2002, 12:57 PM well that was with it out off the box no tweak or anything. just wayint to get my cpu back . i have to wait a month because the is a waiting list SysOpt.com
Copyright Internet.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |