Richard_Cranium72
03-04-2001, 06:14 PM
I'm an old shutterbug from Waaaaayy back so I get suckered by claims of spendor sometimes.
Anyway, got a Fuji MX-2900, ($899.00 Retail) 2.3 m'pixel 3x Optical camera with smartmedia 8mb card.
The colors are similar to Fuji's silver oxide film. They exaggerate the colors, which can be good sometimes.
On the worst setting that 1800x1200 or Basic, the crispness is staggering.
I need to test more, it seems as if there is some dead pixels or maybe the wind was blowing.
While taking pics out back today it was windy, so maybe the cats hair was moving instead of bad pixels in the CCD.
If that is the case,, EUREKA ,, What a Nice Camera..
It's my ,, err, I think 6th personal Digital Camera..
ONe nize machine.
I read over 80 reviews on it..
80% liked it. Throw out half of them, almost any new toy is nice when new.
I did read carefully the "informed" reader's post. Several claimed poor this and that, maybe they're used to a Hasselblad or Leica 2-1/4" or a 4x5 Portrait http://sysopt.earthweb.com/forum/smile.gif
DrVette
Anyway, got a Fuji MX-2900, ($899.00 Retail) 2.3 m'pixel 3x Optical camera with smartmedia 8mb card.
The colors are similar to Fuji's silver oxide film. They exaggerate the colors, which can be good sometimes.
On the worst setting that 1800x1200 or Basic, the crispness is staggering.
I need to test more, it seems as if there is some dead pixels or maybe the wind was blowing.
While taking pics out back today it was windy, so maybe the cats hair was moving instead of bad pixels in the CCD.
If that is the case,, EUREKA ,, What a Nice Camera..
It's my ,, err, I think 6th personal Digital Camera..
ONe nize machine.
I read over 80 reviews on it..
80% liked it. Throw out half of them, almost any new toy is nice when new.
I did read carefully the "informed" reader's post. Several claimed poor this and that, maybe they're used to a Hasselblad or Leica 2-1/4" or a 4x5 Portrait http://sysopt.earthweb.com/forum/smile.gif
DrVette