Post your MadOnion 3DMARK2001 SE build 330 STOCK scores

[AllGamer]

Hi guys, i was just wondering if 7371 score for my Home system in MadOnion 3DMARK2001 SE buiLd 330 is good enough for a factory stock video settings. :p

my Work pc got only 3028. :confused:

Everything is on Default, that goes for drivers, and default madonion tests as well.

So any comments? :t

PS:
:D Home is running ATI All In Wonder RADEON 8500 64MB DV
AMD XP 2000
:r Work is running NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 64MB
intel P4 2.0

[AllGamer]

by the way both are using the latest drivers from the manufacture website
Detonator XP 29.42 from nvidia
Catalyst 2.2 from ATI

[$1500-P4 gamer]

Gee thats a fair comparison-RADEON 8500 64MB vs. NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 64MB. Why dont you just use a G2 in the p4 and bench.:rolleyes: The cpu has next to nothing to do with the 3dmark score after 1gig.:p

[Ralf]

huh..mx420 score so low?
my mx440 default score = 4910.

[AllGamer]

Originally posted by $1500-P4 gamer
Gee thats a fair comparison-RADEON 8500 64MB vs. NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 64MB. Why dont you just use a G2 in the p4 and bench.:rolleyes: The cpu has next to nothing to do with the 3dmark score after 1gig.:p

i'm not comparing ATI vs nVidia, i'm trying to compare apple for apple and orange for orange.

that's why i'll like to see some real numbers NOT OC from other people with same or similar cards

[DocEvi1]

my 1.4Tbird, GF4Ti4400, 512 PC133 system scores 8123 :D chuffed to ribbons.

Stefan

[Chuckyn]

I get around 4900 points on my ATHLON 700Mhz, Mobo Gigabyte ga-7IXE (AGP 2x), 128 Mbs RAM, sb LIVE! 1024, RADEON 8500LE.

Is it normal?

I ask this because I can see you all get higher marks...

Is it maybe a "bottleneck" my proccessor?

THANKS

Sorry for my bad English :p

[AllGamer]

Originally posted by Chuckyn
I get around 4900 points on my ATHLON 700Mhz, Mobo Gigabyte ga-7IXE (AGP 2x), 128 Mbs RAM, sb LIVE! 1024, RADEON 8500LE.

Is it normal?

I ask this because I can see you all get higher marks...

Is it maybe a "bottleneck" my proccessor?

THANKS

Sorry for my bad English :p

have you tried Enabling the 4X AGP BUS, and set the AGP Aperture to match your Video card?

if you have 64 meg for video RAM
set the AGP Aperture to 32 Meg

[AllGamer]

Originally posted by DocEvi1
my 1.4Tbird, GF4Ti4400, 512 PC133 system scores 8123 :D chuffed to ribbons.

Stefan

that sounds about rite
4600 is always first
4400 is always 2nd
8500 is always 3rd

[Chuckyn]

I've tried AGP aperture 32 and 64 meg but my motherboard is only capable to AGP 2x.
Maybe I would have to buy a new motherboard and processor... sigh...

[AllGamer]

well as long as your games runs smoothly, then there's really no need to worry about all these numbers

[Chuckyn]

he he he well but they don't run smoothly...
Thanks anyway

[DocEvi1]

you know, that is possibly the first time I have been quoted :D

Stefan

[AllGamer]

:eek: ooooh.... coooool, .... i guess :confused:

[DocEvi1]

stop been cheeky you young wipper snapper you :D

It just goes to show that either someone clicked on the wrong button :mad: or that I don't talk patter all the time :p

Stefan

[Chuckyn]

what the...?

[unreal_outlaw]

1200x700 (rounded)

Win2k Pro
Soyo K7vtapro -2aa6
Athlon XP 1700+ (not over clcoked)
Radeon 8500 LE
512 pc133

I get a 9000-9300 ish

[grimfandango]

Default setin
no overclockin

Win98se
p4 1.7
256mb sdram
ECS P4VMM2
gf2mx200 64mb

3d mark score 1363


win98se
1600+
256mb sdram
SIS 730 shipset mobo
Gf2mx200 64mb
3d mark score 1332

I really need a better card for both..




:)

[Bigjakkstaffa]

1.33ghz tbird
512 Mb PC133
gf4 ti4200

Just over 8000 at stock - about 50 marks shy of 9000 with JUST the memory overclocked (up to 600MHz :r)

--Jakk:t

[grimfandango]

Originally posted by Bigjakkstaffa
1.33ghz tbird
512 Mb PC133
gf4 ti4200

Just over 8000 at stock - about 50 marks shy of 9000 with JUST the memory overclocked (up to 600MHz :r)

--Jakk:t


am sure with My systems I will 9500+ with a good card!
:p :)

[AllGamer]

with the newest drivers 30.something

now the GF4 is "smoking" at 3040

[spirit of adventure]

Anything from 9300 - 9600 Stock...depending on what ram timing i use...i personally dont class this as overclocking...more like fine tuning ;)

:x :r :D :t

XP1800+
Soltek DRV4
256mb PC2100
Club-3D Geforce 4 Ti4200 128mb
40Gig WD ATA100 7200rpm


"if ya live yalife 4 someone else then u aint livin" be true 2yaself!"

10816 & growing :D

http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4092940

[JuNacy]

Downloaded the patch but didn't notice any improvement. Here we go (everything @ stock, no OC):

P4 1.8A
512MB PC2700
GF3 Ti 200

6957

[Beeblequix]

Hey folks,

Allgamer, you put the 8500 in 3rd in your list....if you go to <http://gamershq.madonion.com> and get into the Hall of Fame, the G4ti4200 is 3rd, 8500 4th...

JuNacy,
That patch actually fixes an inaccuracy which included framerates in between tests, so your score should actually drop a tad (I've heard up to 300 pts).
cheers,
ßeeßle Qµix

[JuNacy]

Originally posted by Beeblequix
Hey folks,

Allgamer, you put the 8500 in 3rd in your list....if you go to <http://gamershq.madonion.com> and get into the Hall of Fame, the G4ti4200 is 3rd, 8500 4th...

JuNacy,
That patch actually fixes an inaccuracy which included framerates in between tests, so your score should actually drop a tad (I've heard up to 300 pts).
cheers,
ßeeßle Qµix

Really? I thought the patch was for AGP 8x support and for future DirectX versions. Anyway, I still haven't noticed any difference, my scores remain pretty constant.

[wend]

Athlon XP 1700+@2000+
Soyo Dragon +
512 DDRAM PC2100
GF3Ti500

and score 8643
Score (http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4045208)

[unreal_outlaw]

Yeah we know the radeon 8500 is a tad bit slower than the gf4ti 4600 so I would expect the outcome that the score is more on the gf4... Just a statement

[OpK Chowdy]

Originally posted by AllGamer


that sounds about rite
4600 is always first
4400 is always 2nd
8500 is always 3rd

eh? isn't the ti4200 better than the r8500?

i get 9119 with my stock geforce4ti4200 btw.

[SLaSheR1976]

my xp1800 and x micro geforce 4ti4200 128 meg scores 9500 on full default run, overclocked cpu and video card (cpu at xp2100 and video card at 270/520) scores 10656:D

[yy22kunming]

Athlonxp2200+(171x10.5) EPOX 8k3a Kingmax 256M DDR400
Gainward GF4 ti42000DT Gold(315/630)40.41 win2k
3D Mark2001(built330):13022

[yy22kunming]

my wrong again

[yy22kunming]

look

[Logan[TeamX]]

I get about 4300 running the following:

AMD XP 1800+, 256MB DDR2100, ECS K7S5A, GeForce 2 Ti 64MB DDR, WinME

O/Cing the 1800 to 2100 gets me to about 5025-5050 3DMarks, running at my preferred level of 1900 gets me about 4600-4700.

[AllGamer]

with the new Drivers on both type of cards now at stock speed i'm getting:

ATI = 7950
nVidia = 3067

[missiveusa]

3rd try using XP 1800+ 256MB PC 2400 EPoX 8KHA+ and GeF4 4200 @ 275/565 MHz

3D Mark 2001 SE 330: 9951. All tests default.

Perhaps with another BIOS update I can break the 10K mark.

:D

[Beeblequix]

WHOA! Anyone use the new 40.41 detonators?

My stock score went up a ~tad~.

New stock NOT overclocked score:
<http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4454097>

10040.

However, I've attributed a few instabilities to these drivers, so they're not as stable as 30.82.

ßeeßle Qµix

[AllGamer]

yes the 40.x drivers are definitely an awesome improvement

all my TNT / TNT 2 / GF / GF4 have all been raised 35+ marks each one

:D

[OpK Chowdy]

Yikes... i just formatted and installed a new hard drive. my STOCK scores for my GF4ti4200 128mb on 1.4Ghz Athlon Tbird is 9950...and if i did this test on a fresh restart i KNOW i'd get 10k. weird stuff...but im not complaining :)

[causticVapor]

The cpu has next to nothing to do with the 3dmark score after 1gig.


HE** NO....
But why listen to me?

A Celeron 1.3 w/SDR and a PNY verto GF4 Ti 4200 gets 5441, while my XP 1800+ paired with the same card and DDR memory gets 9151. Same settings, anisotropy, aa, etc. default clocks on everything.

[causticVapor]

WHOA! Anyone use the new 40.41 detonators?

My stock score went up a ~tad~.

New stock NOT overclocked score:
<http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4454097>

10040.

However, I've attributed a few instabilities to these drivers, so they're not as stable as 30.82.



With the 40.41 drivers, I noticed flickering and artifacts with media player in the fullscreen mode of the battery visualization. When going back to the old 30.xx drivers the problem went away. We'll have to wait for that WHQL cert :D

Yes, and with the coolbits mod enbaling clock adjustments I could overclock my Ti4200 10MHz more (590/630) with stability! The AGP page did not work though. Has anyone tried this?

[AllGamer]

Originally posted by causticVapor
The cpu has next to nothing to do with the 3dmark score after 1gig.


was comparing XP vs P4

[causticVapor]

yes the 40.x drivers are definitely an awesome improvement

all my TNT / TNT 2 / GF / GF4 have all been raised 35+ marks each one



Any improvement under 100 3dmarks is visually unnoticeable in those ranges. Not to spark argument, but I don't like something that gives me a 1% performance increase in 3dMark at the cost of stability. nVidia and ATi... well known for this.

BTW at stock clocks....

[causticVapor]

If the graphics card is the bottleneck then the CPU will not make much of a difference in the 3dMark score, but... based on the benchmarks I've seen on various hardware sites processors that are only 200-300 MHz apart can affect teh 3DMark score by 400-500 points. And yes, they're P4s in the 1.7-3.6GHz and athlons in the 1.3-2.8GHz range.

[causticVapor]

Originally posted by AllGamer


was comparing XP vs P4

Read my post above

BTW sorry for being hard on you man :t

[rizboy]

AMD Athlon 900Mhz
nVidia GeForce 2 MX
256MB PC133 SDRAM
Windows 2000 OS
.
.
.
2404...is that good or bad?

[Bigjakkstaffa]

rizboy

for your system that seems okay... then again your running a gf2 Mx card... which aint too hot at all :(

--Jakk:t

[omega31]

Originally posted by rizboy
AMD Athlon 900Mhz
nVidia GeForce 2 MX
256MB PC133 SDRAM
Windows 2000 OS
.
.
.
2404...is that good or bad?

That's about right for your system.

Look at grimfandango's score:
http://www.sysopt.com/forum/showthread.php?postid=711795#post711795

She has a P4 1.7, 256mb ram, and geforce2 mx and got 1346. So your system beats hers in 3dmark2001. :D

[darrenw1967]

Xp2000+
MX440 video
3d 2001se mark 4980 with detonator 40.



overclocked video card to 280 mhz engine & 420 memory & the score jumped to 6050!:D

[Benssax]

Just want to show off my PIII these are not stock scores!!!

PIII @ 1.5Ghz Very stable
Ti4200 (303/608) Very stable

3dmark 2001 se = 10289 :D

[omega31]

1439
29.42 drivers
Win98SE
PIII 750
Geforce2 mx
256mb ram

This, BTW, is my brother's computer. I built it for him. Even this beats grimfandango's 2 P4 computers. :D

http://www.sysopt.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=113274&perpage=15&pagenumber=2&postid=687666#post687666

So he has a gf2mx. He wanted a decent cheap card, got it last year.

I posted my own scores all over the place, so I won't post them again.

[x51out]

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
DirectX Version 8.1

Mobo Manufacturer
Mobo Model VT8366-8233
AGP Rates (Current/Available) 4x / 1x 2x 4x

CPU AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1404 MHz
FSB 133 MHz
Memory 512 MB
Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS/Pro/Ti
Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS/GeForce2 Pro
Driver Version 6.13.10.4041
Video Memory 64 MB

Program Version 3DMark2001 SE
Resolution 1024x768 32bit
Texture Format Compressed
FSAA Disabled
Z-Buffer Depth 24bit
Frame Buffer Double
Rendering Pipeline D3D Hardware T&L

3DMark Score 4249 3D marks

Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 74.6 FPS
Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 30.9 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 72.2 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 33.7 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 74.7 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 37.1 FPS
Game 4 Nature No hardware support
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 299.2 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 568.5 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 light) 21.7 MTriangels/s
High Polygon Count (8 lights) 4.8 MTriangels/s
Environment Bump Mapping No hardware support
DOT3 Bump Mapping 57.0 FPS
Vertex Shader 47.0 FPS
Pixel Shader No hardware support
Advanced Pixel Shader No hardware support
Point Sprite 8.3

[missiveusa]

Athlon XP 1800 @ 1596 MHz
EPoX 8KHA+
GeF4 4200 @ 275/555 MHz
256 MB PC 2400 DDR @ 276 MHz DDR

3D Mark 2001 SE 330: 10122

Finally broke the 10K mark with a modest OC. My previous score was 9999 :eek: No way I was leaving it at that!

[AllGamer]

hmm... remember this Thread is for STock scores.

there are 2 other 3Dmark threads for all scores, and OC-ed scores

just trying to keep this clean :t

so people that want to know how they rate at normal speed

cuz the MadOnion scores totally sucks at this since 99% are OC-ed scores

[missiveusa]

So sorry:rolleyes: . That's why I posted previous stock 9999 marks. All tests run at default.

[bdmst16]

Athlon 1900 XP
512MB PC2100
GIGABYTE GA-7VRXP VIA KT333
VISIONTEK GEFORCE4 TI4200 (Dent 40 drivers)
Windows XP SP 1

3D Mark 2001: 9800

Anyone know of any tips to raise this without overclocking?

[Bigjakkstaffa]

Try www.tweak3d.net and www.3dspotlight.com for various tweakign guides...

--Jakk:t

[Beeblequix]

Just ran this a few days ago. No overclocking, per Allgamer's request. Dets 30.82.



http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4699917

Asus A7N266-C w Nvidia 415D chipset
MSI Geforce 4 ti 4600 stock speeds
AMD Athlon XP 2200+
SB Live! Platinum 5.1
17 " ADI, 15" POS monitors
IBM 40GB Hdd
12x10x32 Lite-On CDRW
16x40 Toshiba DVD/CDROM
flippy
and other misc stuff...

ßeeßle Qµix
11008 3dmark 2k1sebuild330

[Bigjakkstaffa]

...that be pretty fast... ya git :(

j/k ;)

--Jakk:t

[Bigjakkstaffa]

...that be pretty fast... ya git :(

j/k ;)

--Jakk:t

[Beeblequix]

41.03 detonators yield a niftly little score of

11654

<http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4867115>

Can anyone in here beat that? (probably) :rolleyes: (apples apples, oranges oranges)

Our friend from China was posting .jpgs of overclocked scores. These do not belong in this thread. And peeps, please just put up your URL. Some of us can't get your download through firewalls at work. Besides, the original link is actual, not possibly mocked-up.

ßeeßle Qµix

edit: looks like I'm reigning stock car-d champion in here. "All shall love me and despair..."

[wilier13]

MSI KT3 Ultra2 RAID
AMD XP2000
256 Crucial 2700 DDR
Inno3D GF3 Ti200
30.82 dets

7825

good enough for me. :)

[Sweeper]

P4 2.4GHz -Stock-
I845 (400FSB)
512MB PC133 SDRAM
60 GB WD
GF4 4600
WIN. XP PRO

3DMARK-2K1SE - 10075

[LiquidClown]

P4 2.0ghz
Gigabyte 8i3xp mobo
512 mb pc 2100
GF4 4400
WIN. XP PRO

10,394

[jventuri]

20231


Config: athlon MP Duallie
A7MD266-DL Dual MP2200's, 3.5GB RAM DS333 ECC REG, SCSI RAID with 4 15,000rpm drives, Radeon 9700pro w/voltage mod.
Watercooled Chipset, chips, ram, video etc.
Custom case (see case mods "God Box").



O/C to 2109mhz fsb@156 - 20231 3dMark ...STABLE

JVenturi

:cool:

[Sweeper]

thought this was supposed to be "STOCK" scores.....:(

[omega31]

jventuri also posted to the other 3dmark2001 post, after this one. In any event, jventuri, post a compare link so we can see, and do it in the other thread, since this is for *STOCK* scores only.

[gilerzz]

****, I posted at the old Post. Supposed to be here... heh

3D Mark: 6295 (http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4939229) :t

Got this new Gigabyte R9000 card yesterday. Changed over the previous card, Powercolor R9000 which was faulty. Fresh installed XP Pro and everything running at stock speed. No windows tweaking & overclocking yet. Benchmark at default settings, is that good?


System Specs.

AXP1800+@1533
MSI K7T-Turbo2 (SDRAM :( )
512MB Ram
Win XP Pro+SP1

[Scavenger7]

AMD XP 2400+
ATI Radeon 8500 128
Asus A7V266-E
512 Corsair PC2100

RESULTS
3DMark Score 9071
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 134.6 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 53.2 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 153.5 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 83.9 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 128.6 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 58.5 fps
Game 4 - Nature 49.7 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 828.4 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2055.5 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 38.6 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 9.7 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping 115.7 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping 93.0 fps
Vertex Shader 90.6 fps
Pixel Shader 105.1 fps
Advanced Pixel Shader 81.4 fps
Point Sprites 29.6 MSprites/s

-[Scavenger7 (http://newegg.com/)]---------------------------------------------->
Click Here To Visit Our Team Website. For Seti Help And General Team Info. (http://www.setiteam.com/Internal%20Pages/links_page.htm)
Click Here To Join The Team! And Click Above For The Software Links. (http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_130637.html)
Click Here To See SysOpt.com Users 2002 Team Stats. (www.setiatwork.com/cgi-bin/wkystat.pl?group=SysOpt.com+Users+2002)
Click Here To Goto The Seti@home Web Site! (http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/index.html)

[Tanelusa]

Ok is this a good score for me?:)

http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=5022056

Like I said with my old GF3ti200 comoon 7k!
Now I say,COMOON 8K:x
This all is with an ATI BBA Bios 275\275 no extra ram heat-sinks!
Installed older Hercules drivers and SIS AGP drivers!
And ye I have crappy SDRAM:p and 196mb of it:x

[omega31]

Ok, my latest score: 6474. Athlon XP 1600+, and, well you can see the rest in the link.
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=5097795

[Sweeper]

P4 2.4GHz 400FSB Retail HSF
256PC2700 333 @ 266 (Motherboard limitation)
GF4 4600
WD 60GB 7200RPM
MSI 845G Max (MS-6580)

12042 :rolleyes: