OuTpaTienT
01-24-2001, 11:29 PM
Any of you people catch either of these stories? These machines have gotten to the point that I can't even fantasize about them because I'm incapable of even imagining that kind of power. This "Blue Gene" machine gives new meaning to the term "multi-processor":
Blue Gene will use 32 CPUs in a single chip...
...these chips will contain the computer memory as well...
A total of 64 of those 32-CPU chips will be packaged in a computing node...
...then 8 nodes will be stacked in each rack...
...64 of these racks will get IBM to its goal of a petaflop--
a quadrillion "floating-point" mathematical operations per second.
IBM to research proteins with supercomputer (http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-1480727.html)
------
Then there's this one:
The new supercomputer likely will have 10,000 to 20,000 CPUs...
Compaq, nuclear lab teaming on supercomputer (http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4534657.html?tag=st.ne.1003.saslnk.saseml)
Blue Gene will use 32 CPUs in a single chip...
...these chips will contain the computer memory as well...
A total of 64 of those 32-CPU chips will be packaged in a computing node...
...then 8 nodes will be stacked in each rack...
...64 of these racks will get IBM to its goal of a petaflop--
a quadrillion "floating-point" mathematical operations per second.
IBM to research proteins with supercomputer (http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-1480727.html)
------
Then there's this one:
The new supercomputer likely will have 10,000 to 20,000 CPUs...
Compaq, nuclear lab teaming on supercomputer (http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4534657.html?tag=st.ne.1003.saslnk.saseml)